[RAT Patrol]

The very act of saying "nothing against homosexuals" allows them to claim a status they are not entitled to. There are no homosexual people, only homosexual acts. Those acts are immoral. Would anyone say "nothing against adulterers" or nothing against shoplifters"? To the extent that a person identifies themselves with a behavior, a person has every right to be for or against it. Better he would have said "Nothing against humanity" or "nothing against men."

But your point about the AP is noted.

[caisson71]

Bravo. What many miss in arguments by homosexuals is that homosexuality is defined by a sex act, not necessarily a lifestyle. What the court has done is decide in favor of a deviant, unhealthy sex act. The SCOTUS is really dizzy these days.