Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
Interesting, thanks for the info. I dont usually find myself siding with the dark side..
7 posted on 06/26/2003 7:50:41 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Paradox
Chances are that the dissenters were more mindful that this ruling will likely strike down several minor portions of the USA Patriot Act, which retroactively withdrew statutes of limitations in terrorism cases involving hijackings, kidnappings, bombings and biological weapons. I think that may seem their likely rationale, because a couple of them [Thomas & Rehnquist] sided with the majority that overturned a similar Texas ex post facto violation several years ago. FWIW, Kennedy's dissent basically used the "it's for the children" defense of California's move (compelling state interest to save the children)..
8 posted on 06/26/2003 7:55:31 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson