To: bk1000
Sooner or later someone will insist it is their fundamental right to engauge in behavior YOU find abhorant. If their behavior isn't infringing on my Rights, then why the hell should I care what they do? If they are committing force, fraud, or theft against me... then they will have to answer to my personal protection equipement first. If they survive that, then I will go before the courts to have them prosecuted.
Getting the government to pass a law against nose picking is NOT the way this country is set up to run.
579 posted on
06/26/2003 9:59:29 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
Getting the government to pass a law against nose picking is NOT the way this country is set up to run. Should the SCOTUS void a states anti-nose picking law, hypothetically? Or do states have the right to pass silly laws?
587 posted on
06/26/2003 10:02:56 AM PDT by
NeoCaveman
(Ohio Chapter. Original White Devil for Sharpton!)
To: Dead Corpse
"If their behavior isn't infringing on my Rights, then why the hell should I care what they do? If they are committing force, fraud, or theft against me... then they will have to answer to my personal protection equipement first. If they survive that, then I will go before the courts to have them prosecuted."
To an extent I agree, but a reality check tells me we don't really want unlimited 'rights'....but what do I know? This decision came frome the same bunch of people that just decided it was OK to discriminate against white people.
Heck, I thought that was wrong too!
631 posted on
06/26/2003 10:14:35 AM PDT by
bk1000
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson