Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts; AntiGuv
Kennedy wrote the opinion.

He explicitly said that Bowers was "wrongly decided." Due process means people have a right to the privacy of their bedrooms.

I didn't get it all, but apparently this overturns ALL sodomy laws.

40 posted on 06/26/2003 7:19:24 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
"I didn't get it all, but apparently this overturns ALL sodomy laws.
"

That'd be my guess, too.
269 posted on 06/26/2003 8:26:42 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Wow. The bedroom is now a sactuary?

I think may be next to go, followed by statutory rape, incest, and then nationwide recognition of gay marriage.

SCOTUS just defined sodomy as normal sexual behavior between adults. There is no reason, then to not legally recognize marriage between men.

449 posted on 06/26/2003 9:24:16 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
I hope we get those two retirements and they are liberals or one liberal and O'Connor.

I am disappointed, but I expected this.

So quite frankly, I am having a hard time getting mad about it.

It isn't a vital issue, so I am going to reserve anger for other things even though I am not pleased with this.
937 posted on 06/26/2003 12:06:26 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Due process means people have a right to the privacy of their bedrooms

That's not what due process means at all. It means there must be a pre-defined process for determining guilt or innocence where the accussed has the right to confront his/her accussers and present her/his side of the case. It says nothing about what may or may not be criminalised. Basically it says that justice cannot be arbitrary.

I actually think they used the "priveleges and immunites" portion of the 14 amendment to apply the 4th amendment to the states. I don't know as that is a proper reading of the 4th amendment though, since the 4th only protects "privacy" against unreasonable searches and siezures", not in general.

Now if they will just use the same 14th amendment provision to apply the second amendment, which is pretty absolute, to the state governments. But I won't be holding my breath waiting for them to do so.

1,285 posted on 06/26/2003 2:57:37 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson