Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thane_Banquo
from Kennedy's opinion:

The present case does not involve minors. It does not involve persons who might be injured or coerced or who are situated in relationships where consent might not easily be refused. It does not involve public conduct or prostitution. It does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter.

305 posted on 06/26/2003 8:36:39 AM PDT by jethropalerobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jethropalerobber
http://scotus.ap.org/scotus/02-102p.zo.pdf
318 posted on 06/26/2003 8:39:17 AM PDT by Carlucci (The Time Travelers meeting will be held Yesterday!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

To: jethropalerobber
Sounds like Kennedy, in giving his opinion, had heard all the specious histrionics that gets hashed and rehashed on FR every time a thread on this subject comes up. He also decisively shot down that folly.
383 posted on 06/26/2003 8:57:32 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

To: jethropalerobber
The present case does not involve minors. It does not involve persons who might be injured or coerced or who are situated in relationships where consent might not easily be refused. It does not involve public conduct or prostitution. It does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter.

Yes, but just like Roe, it will be expanded to allow those behaviors.

971 posted on 06/26/2003 12:19:47 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson