[GreatOne]

Absolutely revolting. What about stare decisis, which Justice Souter said was so important in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Oh, forgot - stare decisis is only for liberal scumbag decisions.

Where in the freaking constitution does it say that we can't have laws which "demean" people? People who engage in behavior which has (or, at least until know, had), with rare exceptions, been universally condemned for 5000 years deserve no special protection from having their feelings hurt (poor widdle butt-plugging babies).

In the next 10 years, we will see the following: sodomite marriage, marriage between siblings, and the lowering of the age of consent.

I can't say anything else without cursing violently - I'm so damn angry!

[B Knotts]

stare decisis is only for liberal scumbag decisions.

Funny how that works, eh?

[The Red Zone]

and the lowering of the age of consent

This may already be the case. If a state allows people to marry at a sub-adult age, then it now will have to allow them to do the sodomy thing too. Excuse me, I am about to be sick.

[tdadams]

Where in the freaking constitution does it say that we can't have laws which "demean" people?

So, you apparently believe having laws that demean people is a good thing. How odd.

[Lijahsbubbe]

In the next 10 years, we will see the following: sodomite marriage, marriage between siblings, and the lowering of the age of consent.

I think that's what many are reacting to, while others consider it reactionary.

We all have seen over the years what happens when the camel gets his nose in the tent. We've seen it with our schools.

In my opinion, the way is being cleared for same-sex marriages.