[El Gato]

While Kennedy cited Roe, what is so interesting about this decision, is that it backed away from the right to privacy concept. The rationale of this decision, along with Griswald and Roe in a repackaging effort, were wrapped in a yet even broader and more vague concept about the due process right to liberty where its exercise is fundamental to the person. No, I am not making this up.

What's worse, IMHO they cited decisions by the European Court of Human Rights, and the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. Short quote below:

And, to the extent Bowers relied on values shared with a wider civilization, the case's reasoning and holding have been rejected by the European Court of Human Rights, and that other nations have taken action consistent with an affirmation of the protected right of homosexual adults to engage in intimate, consensual conduct

[Torie]

Ya, total spam. It is like giving someone a hunting license to bag as many game as they want, anywhere, anytime. It is odd that the media has not picked up on my line of arguement here. Either I am missing something, or the media is.

[janette]

El Gato, I just used your last mail to respond, I did not read the thread, but I have to say something



After following the news I want to mention that:

Americans, be aware, not to loose your rights to do whatever you want to do in your own home!!!!, on your own lot!

Gay sexuality is as old as the world is covered with humans!

In ancient cultures it was comman to have sex between males.
OK, times changed, but the sodomie-law is too old and laws should change with times!

People be real, are you sure, only Gay couples practice this kind of sex??????!!!!!

I don't like hypocricy

Flame me, go on people of FR ---- but don't forget to be true, or else, shut up