No, I still would. Homosexuality is immoral now and forever. Having said that, I'm consistently amused by you libertarians always instantly promoting social conservatives to positions of super-authority. Gotta be Freudian. Anyway, if society has descended to that point and people have no problem with it, there's not much one guy banging away on a keybord on the North Shore can do about it.
so when you said "this behavior damages society" because "sex is for procreation" that was just hand waving to cover for your real motivation for criminalizing sodomy: a religious belief that it's immoral. i'll thank you for keeping your religion out of my government.
I'm consistently amused by you libertarians always instantly promoting social conservatives to positions of super-authority.
first, the rejection of theocracy does not make one a libertarian. and second, since when does asking someone a question equal "promoting" them to "super-authority"? dear God what an ego. your opinions do not even carry the authority of an honest and logically consistant argument. most of the questions posed to you on this board are intended to uncover your ignorance, not ellicit your insights.