Replies

What you do NOT have the right to do, is mandate or prohibit the otherwise peaceful behavior of your unwilling neighbors by force.
That would be the 10th amendment.

The subjugation of rights is no more morally justifiable at the state or local level, than at the federal level.

The subjugation of rights is no more morally justifiable at the state or local level, than at the federal level.

Only to the whining Liberaltarian who ignores the constitution. But what would you know about morality anyway?

I see your back for a visit. A great day for libertarians and leftists who yearn for an overly strong central government ruled by an oligarchy of 9.

The only difference between the leftists and the libertarians is your goals diverge at certain points. Both would like to issue edicts from Washington so that the pissants can enjoy "freedom" your way.

Disgusting display of ideology over Constitution.

Kennedy's decision is a policy decision ungrounded in the Constitution, using the abominable Roe as precedent and contrary to his own opinion that Roe was unconstitutional.

Did the Constitution change in the past 17 years? Was it amended to include a "right to privacy"?

One can abhor peeking in windows, which of course seldom happens, and also abhor the edicts from Washington, libertarians and leftists.