Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JoeSchem
Now, does anyone else have any more arcane justifications for why Ken Starr didn't mention treason in his book?

He didn't investigate it is the reason I guess. Eric Holder and Reno were very careful about where they let Starr look around. "Career civil servants at the DOJ" were handling the China charges. They ended up pleading everyone out.

126 posted on 06/29/2003 5:49:53 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: DPB101; JoeSchem
Yours is an even more cogent point. One could hardly imagine that Starr would have been granted carte blanche to investigate anything he wanted. Before criticizing the narrowness of his investigation, we should first find out the limitations that were placed of his endeavors.

DPB: I looked to see who Eric Holder was. His chief claim to fame was the raid in Florida to capture the little boy named Elian. When this child was shipped to Castro's Cuba I wondered what was the ACLU's position because they fought in the 1980s to keep a twelve year old here rather than send him to his parents in Russia. The ACLU was too busy fighting for gay marriages and against partial birth abortions to protect Elian from being sent to Castro.
128 posted on 06/29/2003 7:21:41 PM PDT by HISSKGB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson