[Cael]

NOW... the mere fact that the centrifuge was there is a violation of your precious UN resolutions. I'm getting the distinct feeling that you didn't want us in Iraq at all.

Sorry, not a fan of the UN or of the Iraqi regime. But if I were you, I wouldn't be mocking their "precious" resolutions, considering we used them (rightfully, I might add) to justify the war.

btw, I think we all know that Iraq was called to disarm after Desert Storm, as I think we expected to find more than a barrel of ragtag parts of an old nuclear program. I'm hoping we find more than that, so I'm going to save my celebration for when we find the real motherlode.

[VRWC_minion]

You: "we expected to find more than a barrel of ragtag parts of an old nuclear program."

The expert: "would have saved Saddam's regime several years and as much as hundreds of millions of dollars for research. "

Some rag tag ?

Say, exactly how old does a nuclear program have to be before its outdated ? Are you equating nuclear weapons construction to DOS 3.1 ?

[Darksheare]

You mean, don't mock the mighty toothless and impotent UN that couldn't enforce a resolution in Iraq to save itself?
Why not?

If we all know that Iraq was called to disarm, then what's your beef with the centrifuge hidden in a barrel?
If that doesn't violate 1441, and every prior resolution, then what in your opinion does?
You've made quite a case for thinking that you're a Blix bot, and I've seen zero evidence to the contrary as shown by your whininmg about imminent threat and the cliched "this doesn't matter, where's the rest of it?"

Me, I'll celebrate when they find Sadman and KILL him like a dog.
'Course, being a former artillery type, I'd prefer to strap him to a wooden stake in the middle of an impact zone and see how many fire mission it takes before we actually kill him.