Skip to comments.
Scalded, drowned baby was in tub for a nap [10 month old put in bath tub for nap dies]
The Grand Rapids Press ^
| Wednesday, June 25, 2003
| Theresa D. Mcclellan
Posted on 06/25/2003 11:22:28 AM PDT by FourPeas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: raybbr
He's a real cutie, that's for sure. Give him a raspberry on the belly for me.
41
posted on
06/25/2003 1:43:20 PM PDT
by
wimpycat
To: wimpycat
Belly blow! We do that to the Dread Boston Salty, and it paralyzes him. He just lies on his back, stomach bare to the world, and waits for it to happen again.
42
posted on
06/25/2003 1:44:54 PM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: FourPeas
This sounds like a babysitter tourtured the kid then drowned it to cover her tracks.
If the kid turned on the water, who turned it off??
How did the kid get burned when hot water comes out cold for a minute or so?
If the kid got burned, why didn't the sitter her any screams?
This seems like a murder, period.
43
posted on
06/25/2003 1:45:30 PM PDT
by
PatrioticAmerican
(If the only way an American can get elected is through Mexican votes, we have a war to be waged.)
To: PatrioticAmerican
I tend to agree with your theories, mainly due to the missing information in the press release. I am not saying the press excluded the info to protect someone, but did so to protect the police. By that I mean the ability to press charges and not have them dismissed due to something stated in the press.
Here is the clue to what went on.
At 12:15 p.m. Stickney left the day-care home, leaving two caregivers, ages 17 and 28, in charge.
Let's see, 28 year old man and 17 year old girl? (And just what the hell is a caregiver? Especially one that ignores a babies cries?)
Sinnamon said the two caregivers, whom he did not name, reported hearing the baby in the tub crying at 2:30 p.m., but no one checked on her, Sinnamon said.
Two 'caregivers' who didn't check on a crying baby left in a tub, because they were partying and didn't want to be bothered.
44
posted on
06/25/2003 1:52:38 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
To: raybbr
I had a cutie like that (actually two.) Now the younger is about 6'4" and looks down on me, calls me "shortie" ( I am a 6' shrimp.)
45
posted on
06/25/2003 1:52:56 PM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
To: FourPeas
It also depends on what the water heater temperature was set at. A good institution would not set it hot enough to scald.
To: null and void
Mine turned 10 on 11 June...we both blinked...
To: UCANSEE2
Potheads? Crackheads? Drunks?
48
posted on
06/25/2003 2:26:45 PM PDT
by
PatrioticAmerican
(If the only way an American can get elected is through Mexican votes, we have a war to be waged.)
To: wimpycat
You're right- it IS possible. You can't hide from any possibility in the search for the truth.
49
posted on
06/25/2003 2:40:18 PM PDT
by
agooga
To: Cultural Jihad
you're wierd.
50
posted on
06/25/2003 2:47:12 PM PDT
by
agooga
To: agooga
Of course. However, it's better to look at the likely first, and if you can eliminate the likely, then you start looking at the possible. The two "caregivers" and the daycare owner haven't cleared themselves yet. The two likeliest scenarios are that one of them drowned the baby on purpose, and that an older child did it (by accident or on purpose) while the two caregivers had left the house or were otherwise not paying any sort of attention. The baby doing it herself is the least likely scenario.
51
posted on
06/25/2003 3:27:12 PM PDT
by
wimpycat
To: Xenalyte
The right to pursue happiness is far from an 'assumed right.' It's what compels most self-governed people to attend to jury duty on horrific cases.
To: FourPeas
Thanks for the complement.
It's not a tag. It's a bottle cap on a 2 quart bottle. However, do not let him see a tag for there is no peace until he gets his hands on it.
53
posted on
06/25/2003 5:15:25 PM PDT
by
raybbr
To: FourPeas
Another child got mischievous most likely.
Either way, very sad.
54
posted on
06/25/2003 5:16:59 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: raybbr
How sweet he looks--my baby will be 10 months old on July 5th (a boy). His hair is getting all curly in the back and he tries to climb everything in sight (dogs, furniture, etc). He's going to see his grandparents for the first time in 6 months on Friday--they can't wait!
To: agooga
Your happiness wasn't robbed at hearing of a cruel death in your society?! Of course it was.
To: Cultural Jihad
I thought the law was what compels us to sit on juries.
57
posted on
06/25/2003 5:27:54 PM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: FourPeas
At the very least it sounds like negligence that led to death... even if that baby somehow turned on the water, it is simply unthinkable to completely ignore a baby that long when it is in your care.
As others have mentioned, though, scalding/burns are a common form of child abuse... especially feet and legs and with the deliberate use of scalding hot water :-(
58
posted on
06/25/2003 7:09:24 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
(Liberalism.... the willing suspense of rationality.)
To: FourPeas
Don't you also normally HEAR when the water turns on in the shower/tub? It has made a distinct sound in every place I've ever lived. Baby in tub+Water Sounds+Baby Crying=Run to Tub. Of course, if you're dumb enough to put the baby in there in the first place, especially without knob guards... I think the theories about it being a cover story are probably correct.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson