[BOBTHENAILER]

It's very important the damning information that Clinton could have taken bin Laden out on three occasions is disseminated to as many people as possible, so please pass it along.

I couldn't agree more with your assessment of this. Will be mass emailing to all my non-freepers friends.

[Lee'sGhost]

So, what do we have here? The AP is saying that Bush didn't act on intelligence info? Aren't they claiming that intelligence for Iraqi was no good? So, Bush is guilty of NOT acting on intel re OBL, and guilty OF acting on intel re Saddaam?

Also, Clintoon's defense re not accepting the gift-wrapped OBL was that there was no legal justification, but BJ gave Bush info on where OBL so Bush could take him out? I'm wondering what the legal justification for THAT action was?

Klintoon logic:
Capture a terrorist w/o legal justification -- no go.
Kill a terrorist w/o legal justification -- COOL!