[My2Cents]

Remember the time during the fight of Tora Bora when a Predator saw a convoy of SUVs in the mountains, and a tall Arab among the crowd that intelligence suspected was Osama? The Predator fired a Hellfire missle, killing the assembled group. They were likely up to no good, but it turned out that Osama was not among them.

If the stroy is ciruclating that Osama was sited by a Predator prior to 9/11, consider it another attempt by the Clinton Apologists (the fastest growing industry in America, btw) to deflect error in judgment from their guy.

Two other things. There can never be 100% assurance that anyone is identified by a Predator. And, secondly, prior to 9/11, we had no good reason to rain-down a missle on a group of unidentifiable Arabs, suspecting Osama was in the group.

[Sabertooth]

What I'm trying to get across is the the bin Laden sightings were by more than just drones. Focusing in the Predators, as in the article at the top of this thread, is the hook that is supposed to provide cover for the Clintons.

Here's an unedited posting of the original Washington Post article, on an independent site. No sign-up necessary.