Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Muleteam1
The Tamarisk trees were imported in the 1800's from the Middle East. They were brought in for wind blocks and planted all over AZ, CO, UT and NM. They soak up water like a sponge. I have heard that these trees use up almost 1/4 of the water in the Rio Grande. As you stated, the state has tried to get rid of them but the USFWS stands in the way. Remember the USFS bonehead who tried to conduct a controlled burn in the middle of our windy season?
71 posted on 06/25/2003 2:01:37 PM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: wjcsux
>>As you stated, the state has tried to get rid of them but the USFWS stands in the way. <<

The primary concern expressed for getting rid of the salt cedar underbrush is the loss of possible habitat for the Southwestern willow flycatcher which is known to use these habitats. However, it seems pretty short-sighted to simply overlook the millions of gallons of water needed to support these exotic plants in a desert climate.

>>Remember the USFS bonehead who tried to conduct a controlled burn in the middle of our windy season?<<

Ha! Indeed I do. The conversion of the Forest Service to a Park Service is slowly, but surely occuring. Most people do not realize that, although the Forest Service is still an agency of the US Department of Agriculture, it's annual budgets are now dissiminated through the Department of the Interior.

Muleteam1

73 posted on 06/25/2003 4:42:15 PM PDT by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson