Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amerigomag
"The ABP will sadly conclude, after their experience, that it is cheaper to acquire, operate and maintain a light, civilian aircraft with a flight crew of two than it is to attempt to operate an autonomous, integrated, night surveillance system utilizing UAVs. "

I don't buy it. If you can put the machine up there for $30k. If it lasts just 3 years that $10k a year.

As to software, I am sure the government has the specifications down that they want and can turn to other developers if the current developers try to jack the price up too high. It might mean that it's a few more years before they are being used in mass, but it's still a brilliant idea. And you can be sure the government isn't going to pass on it, because a couple of developers are going to get greedy.

28 posted on 06/24/2003 6:03:33 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN
If you can put the machine up there for $30k.

That's one (1) UAV for $30K - $50K. A minimum of 4 are needed for 10/7 coverage of 100 square miles and then there's the communication package which involves mutipule, ground based transceivers/relays or a satellite subscription or a an aerial communication relay platform with a 10 hour endurance.

For those from Rio Linda that's about US$1M to cover two canyons for 10 hours each evening for a year.

31 posted on 06/24/2003 6:46:16 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson