Skip to comments.
Zap! Air Force eyes Star Wars-style lasers
Scripps Howard News Service ^
| June 24, 2003
| SUE VORENBERG
Posted on 06/24/2003 11:58:29 AM PDT by Mister Magoo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: Mister Magoo; Admin Moderator
I knew it!The Admin Moderator has been testing these weapons for over a year....
2
posted on
06/24/2003 12:00:35 PM PDT
by
amused
(Republicans for Sharpton!)
To: Mister Magoo
A new high energy laser weapon and F-16 flight simulator, designed by the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Theater Aerospace Command Control Simulation Facility at Kirtland Air Force Base, will let pilots test technology that could put the United States far ahead of its enemies.
Thank God that George Bush is our president now. If Clinton was still in office I'm sure all the Chinese had to do to get this technology is to ask for it.
To: godlovesrepublicans
If Clinton was still in office I'm sure all the Chinese had to do to get this technology is to ask for it. No, they would have to funnel some money into hillary's election campaign.
To: godlovesrepublicans
Yay!! My USAF daughter will be SOOOOO cooled out to have these fun toys fall into the paws of eager Zoomies. And to think, her uncle wanted her to be a Marine... ;)
5
posted on
06/24/2003 12:07:22 PM PDT
by
dandelion
To: Mister Magoo
There have been a continual flow of these article about the U.S. developing super weapons. I think we must be sending signals to the other countries.
6
posted on
06/24/2003 12:09:55 PM PDT
by
7 x 77
To: Mister Magoo
Star Wars style lasersI think this is a VERY BAD idea!
Our fighters can fire missles that precisely take out targets many, many miles away. In Star Wars, they can't even hit another spaceship right in front of them with their lasers.
To: Mister Magoo
"The laser is also a much more cost-effective weapon versus firing a missile that costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. Firing the laser will likely only cost a couple hundred dollars." Only a couple of hundred dollars. Excellent. Put these babies into mass production as quick as possible.
8
posted on
06/24/2003 12:13:15 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: Mister Magoo; *miltech; *tech_index; MizSterious; shadowman99; Sparta; freedom9; martin_fierro; ...
9
posted on
06/24/2003 12:14:10 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
To: Onelifetogive
Our fighters can fire missles that precisely take out targets many, many miles away. In Star Wars, they can't even hit another spaceship right in front of them with their lasers. These Air Force generals aren't stupid, ignorant, masochists. If the weapon is not likely to be better than missles they'll stop developing it.
10
posted on
06/24/2003 12:16:41 PM PDT
by
7 x 77
To: 7 x 77
If the weapon is not likely to be better than missles they'll stop developing it. Sounds like a replacement for the auto-cannon; possibly the Sidewinder in some types of egagements.
11
posted on
06/24/2003 12:21:39 PM PDT
by
Tallguy
(Trying desperately to ignore Hillary.... and not succeeding.)
To: Mister Magoo; Poohbah; section9; Dog
Man, I almost feel sorry for anyone who decides to mess with the good ol' USA...
12
posted on
06/24/2003 12:22:44 PM PDT
by
hchutch
("If you don’t win, you don’t get to put your principles into practice." David Horowitz)
To: Onelifetogive
We need more Wamprats.
13
posted on
06/24/2003 12:23:22 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Onelifetogive
In Star Wars, they can't even hit another spaceship right in front of them with their lasers. They can if they trust the Force.
To: Mister Magoo
It could be ready for use in 2012Whew! Just in time to defeat the aliens that will be returning in December, 2012 -- the end of the Mayan calendar's current cycle --
15
posted on
06/24/2003 12:24:21 PM PDT
by
xrp
To: Onelifetogive
"In Star Wars, they can't even hit another spaceship right in front of them with their lasers. "That's because they were using the politically correct, ultra slow lasers.
The same reason they were using light wands, when clearly 20th century era glocks have a distinct advantage.
16
posted on
06/24/2003 12:24:38 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: DannyTN
Put them in pods and hang them from the wings of B-52. Say about 6 per pylon. Dependant on the recharge/fire rate the Buff would be able to carpet laze instead of bomb. Talk about death from above... This will change the whole nature of warfare.
17
posted on
06/24/2003 12:24:38 PM PDT
by
Outlaw76
(Citizens on the bounce!)
To: Tallguy
No ammo but energy is required. If it turns out light enough, a sufficient power source would make this damn formidable!
18
posted on
06/24/2003 12:24:50 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: 7 x 77
There have been a continual flow of these article about the U.S. developing super weapons. I think we must be sending signals to the other countries.
Could also be a way of showing the public the fruits of the increased spending?
...but I'm sure it does have a bonus pant-wetting effect you allude to.
19
posted on
06/24/2003 12:24:51 PM PDT
by
GoatWorship
(Beware the suit with the plastic smile)
To: Onelifetogive
Flying thru hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson