I will rely on people remembering that that was reported on threads here. There was quite a flap about the administration issuing those amicus briefs, if you remember.
I would prefer to see you support
YOUR assertion rather than
"...rely(ing)
on people remembering that that was reported on threads here."You said it....but can't support it?
He did NOT argue (because he had been ordered not to) that racial diversity is not a compelling interest that can justify practising racial discrimination if it is narrowly tailored.
Actual proof of your allegation?