To: hchutch; Howlin
Is it me, or did SCOTUS just basically tell a STATE UNIVERSITY that the Federal government had no business meddling in their decision on who they will assist in enrolling, or how they reach that decision, as long as there is not an unconstitutional advantage given to minorities via the point system?
294 posted on
06/23/2003 8:22:45 AM PDT by
Luis Gonzalez
(Cuba será libre...soon.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
I'll have to read the actual decision to be able to discuss that, but that is what it appears to say.
The talking heads seem to think this is a big deal.
296 posted on
06/23/2003 8:24:27 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: Luis Gonzalez
Is it meNope, not just you - if I'm reading this right, that's EXACTLY what they're saying. And if so, it has much larger ramifications for down the road...
299 posted on
06/23/2003 8:25:06 AM PDT by
mhking
To: Luis Gonzalez
Dunno if I'd use that reasoning exactly.
It's more along the lines of a burden of proof issue to me. The undergrad applicants proved they were being discriminated against, and the system got tossed. The law school student couldn't prove it, and as a result, that system stood up.
That is how I would expect ALL such claims of discrimination to be handled. I can live with this split decision.
312 posted on
06/23/2003 8:28:40 AM PDT by
hchutch
("If you don’t win, you don’t get to put your principles into practice." David Horowitz)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson