Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brian S
This shows how important the judicial branch really is. This is why we MUST fight for all of Bush's judges.
13 posted on 06/23/2003 7:19:53 AM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Capitalism2003
This shows how important the judicial branch really is. This is why we MUST fight for all of Bush's judges.

It doesn't seem to do any good. Seven of the current justices were appointed by Republicans, if I recall correctly.

25 posted on 06/23/2003 7:22:11 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Capitalism2003
This is why we MUST fight for all of Bush's judges.

It would help if he fought himself.

MM

75 posted on 06/23/2003 7:28:35 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Capitalism2003
"This shows how important the judicial branch really is. This is why we MUST fight for all of Bush's judges"

You are right, but we are ineffectual in fighting for judges. Winning some Senate seats will make make President Bush's judicial confirmations a piece of cake. We simply must throw out some democrat senators.

And whoever urged caution before reacting to the first decision was very wise. We always need to wait a bit before we go off the deep end, especially with seat of the pants Supreme Court interpretations.

86 posted on 06/23/2003 7:30:27 AM PDT by YaYa123 (Hillary VIP = Vicious Insufferable Phony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Capitalism2003
This is why we MUST fight for all of Bush's judges.

Right. We need Republican liberals over DemocRat liberals. It is better to hit the wall at 85 mph than 100 mph.

111 posted on 06/23/2003 7:35:34 AM PDT by Lysander (My army can kill your army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Capitalism2003
If this decision had gone the other way there would have been irreparable harm to the President's campaign for a second term.

Please consider how every decision on every issue between now and election day must be viewed thru the prism of 2004.

302 posted on 06/23/2003 8:25:37 AM PDT by OldFriend (Liberal bias in the media????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Capitalism2003
"his is why we MUST fight for all of Bush's judges."

Please don't make such thoughtless statements. It is not about Bush. He has proven to be less than conservative in many cases. What we need are judges that uphold the constitution...As it was originaly intended. And we need judges that do not like the federal government infringing on state rights. If Bush picks someone who does not meet that criteria then don't support the pick and don't support Bush on the pick. Conservatives need to get back to supporting people based on what they beleve...Not based on who picked them or what party they are from.

622 posted on 06/23/2003 8:46:59 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson