Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STOCKHRSE
I found it difficult to understand why Mrs. Mitchell's testimony was skewed because Mr. Mitchell was(allegedly) watching a non-existent football game. Logic?

Because Mr. Mitchell uses the "football game" (as expressed in his own words to Dan Abrams on national TV, not bowl games and not previews) to verify his time frame for seeing the dog. And they were interviewed immediately over the telephone by the police. Intersting how you now read that Mitchell's story is changing. Good thing for prosecutors that the Mitchells went public before they could be coached by McAllister.

71 posted on 06/25/2003 8:17:41 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: RGSpincich
Mr Mitchell is not the witness....Is he?
76 posted on 06/25/2003 10:52:52 AM PDT by STOCKHRSE ( The preceding is this Freepers opinion and is submitted rhetorically. .........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson