Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/23/2003 5:27:38 AM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: 1bigdictator; 2sheep; A_perfect_lady; a_witness; agrace; American in Israel; Anamensis; ...
It's about damn time!
2 posted on 06/23/2003 5:28:50 AM PDT by Alouette (Why is it called "International Law" if only Israel and the United States are expected to keep it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
Finally!
3 posted on 06/23/2003 5:29:51 AM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
This is a good question that would of been answered a long time ago in the affirmative, if the idiots in the State Department and the White House were not so enamoured with Saudi Arabia.
5 posted on 06/23/2003 5:31:52 AM PDT by zarf (fuggetaboutit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
The rotten, filthy, old ba**ard is responsible for numerous terror incidents. Many recent ones too. Just off him. Get it over with since he has recently embraced Islam (godless commie homo that he is) and Islamics love martyrdom. So do him a favor
7 posted on 06/23/2003 5:37:19 AM PDT by dennisw (G-d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
Of course he should be killed. Its not even a subject for a debate. Arafart's a terrorist with Jewish blood on his head.
8 posted on 06/23/2003 5:38:01 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
Don't debate killing Arrid-fart; kill him, Israel! Way past time. he should have been offed many years ago.
10 posted on 06/23/2003 5:48:53 AM PDT by Hinoki Cypress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
They are not going to kill Arafat or even expell him, I would bet everything on that. The reason is because Arafat is so demonised, that it serves the Israelis well to keep him there for propaganda purposes. You can talk about this and that, but Arafat is staying.
12 posted on 06/23/2003 6:05:23 AM PDT by ellhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
This has always been discussed, however, the US safety net over Arafat has overruled such just action against the terrorist.
13 posted on 06/23/2003 6:10:16 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
"Arafat has been confined by Israeli military forces to his partially destroyed compound in the West Bank city of Ramallah for the last 18 months."

Don'tcha know that this place has got to have developed a pretty foul odour by now? Or does it have running wa-wa?

This story reads as if someone - just now - has for the first time come up with the idea that perhaps Aero-phat might - MIGHT - be a thorn in the side of any peace efforts and MAYBE - just MAYBE - things might be better if he were to assume room temp.

Fact is that taking the jerk out has been debated for over a decade, and for reasons unknown, the Israelis have always decided that having him alive is better than the martyrdom that would result were he dust. The currently-running debate is over how to get rid of him without creating a martyr.

And it would take no planning whatsoever to get rid of his heartbeat. If it were decided to do so right now, the deed could easily be accomplished in the next 5 minutes.

That said - as long as Aero-phat is alive, there will be no peace. Aero himself is an enemy of peace - he exists as a warrior on a mission. In some ways he's like the Democrats - always fighting for issues they never plan to enact, for to do so would rob them of the issue to stump with. If there is peace in the Muddle East, then Aero has nothing to live for.

Which is why he's got to go. And the billions he's got stashed must be liberated.

Michael

14 posted on 06/23/2003 6:10:31 AM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
Debate? No need.... He go bye-bye.
18 posted on 06/23/2003 6:19:13 AM PDT by b4its2late (Strip Mining Prevents Forest Fires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
CAN YOU SAY TRIAL BALLOON?

This is their way of letting everyone know what's coming. Finally!
19 posted on 06/23/2003 6:21:24 AM PDT by right wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
Of course they've talked about killing Arafat. The very interesting question is: Why is the Israeli chief of staff saying this publicly now?

Officers at this level do not make statements with such ramifications without a reason. What is that reason? and why just now?

20 posted on 06/23/2003 6:32:24 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
If he perished as a result of a work accident or an internal coup, who could argue the point?

I wouldn't be able to know for sure.

Will the talking heads complain? Who listens to them let alone believes them any more?

How long would Arafat have lasted had he aided even one attack against America?

If your answer was "not long", you get a prize.

21 posted on 06/23/2003 6:58:02 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (To smash the ugly face of Socialism is our mission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
Do it, should have been done a long time ago.
I fail to understand why the Israelis haven't done the job long ago.
22 posted on 06/23/2003 7:05:40 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
"The subject was debated in terms of costs and benefits," Yaalon said.

What cost could killing Arafat possibly have that outweighs its benefits?

23 posted on 06/23/2003 7:07:55 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win (The EU will break up any day, but the USA is here to stay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYC GOP Chick
* ping
24 posted on 06/23/2003 7:08:54 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (White Devils for Sharpton. We're bad. We're Nationwide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
this decision has already been made
30 posted on 06/23/2003 7:38:28 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
Killing him will anger the Palestinians, Arabs and the world.

Oh, they already are angered by the existence of Israel.

Well, then just kill him.
32 posted on 06/23/2003 8:51:52 AM PDT by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
As long as they are debating HOW to kill him.
35 posted on 06/23/2003 9:51:24 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alouette
Hey ... why not go after Arafat - and then BLAME IT ON ISRAEL - allowing Syria to attack Israel.

Not a good move ...!!!
36 posted on 06/23/2003 12:56:39 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson