Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When an A is a D - States make diplomas count by sticking with senior tests
USA Today ^ | June 22, 2003 | staff

Posted on 06/23/2003 12:53:34 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Parents hearing recent news reports about ''exit exams'' that high school seniors must pass to earn a diploma probably assume they're a bad idea doomed to a well-deserved death.

In Massachusetts, where 4,800 seniors were denied diplomas for failing the mandatory tests, state authorities had to quash a rebellion among superintendents planning to give out diplomas anyway. This month in California, state school officials retreated from a plan that would have denied diplomas to tens of thousands of students likely to fail exit tests, which now won't be used until 2006. And Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has been hounded by protesters demanding diplomas for 14,000 seniors who flunked the exams.

Yes, denying diplomas to seniors who fail a test is harsh. But that decision was made intentionally by 24 states to ensure that diplomas signify more than just 12 years of attendance. If states abandon exit exams just as the first consequences are kicking in, school officials only confirm their earlier fears: that high school diplomas are no guarantee to colleges, employers or taxpayers that graduates have mastered key information.

The value of high school diplomas has been slipping for years. While 63% of teachers believe high school grades reflect a student's abilities, only 23% of college professors agree, according to a 2002 survey by Public Agenda, a public policy polling group.

The credibility gap among employers is almost as wide. While 78% of high school teachers say diplomas prepare students for the workforce, only 41% of employers agree, according to a 2001 Public Agenda survey.

The problem is that grades alone are a poor indicator of learning. Consider:

* In a 1997 survey by a Georgia State University researcher, 86% of teachers said students' ''efforts'' were part of their grade.

* Using data from a 1988 federal test, U.S. Department of Education researchers found that ''A'' students in schools in poor neighborhoods had the same reading scores as ''D'' students in schools in affluent areas.

That's why exit exams were devised -- to ensure that a diploma means something.

Critics say the tests are unfair to minorities. And they cite education experts who say a student's fate should not rest on a single exam. Both points are valid. As are parents' complaints when suddenly told that their children won't graduate. Even so, those problems reflect how some states implement the exams -- not their worth.

Minorities do fail the exams at higher rates, a gap that shows up on all standardized tests. Ideally, that fact should pressure states and schools to do more to help minority students, well in advance of graduation.

Critics also rightly point out that a diploma should not hinge on a one-time test. The sensible solution is to provide students with multiple chances to pass it.

What's more, districts that require exit exams can ensure that students have a fair chance of passing by offering early tutoring for those who struggle. And states can give alternative, lower-level diplomas that signify attendance, but not mastery of the material.

Doubts over the soundness of exit exams were dispelled by New York State. In 1996, critics predicted disaster when the state announced that all students would be required to meet the high standards for Regents diplomas, which had been earned mostly by college-bound students. But in the class of 2002, the first required to pass four Regents exams, 93% of seniors graduated.

That shows exit exams, when administered properly, can be a powerful tool for school reform. And they give students a diploma that recognizes real achievements.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: education; graduation; testing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2003 12:53:35 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Minorities do fail the exams at higher rates, a gap that shows up on all standardized tests." This statement is a complete lie. Asians, a minority in the United States, consistently outperform all other groups. Even recent arrivals score better than native born blacks. Opps. I'm sorry to mention the facts. I guess I'm a racist.
2 posted on 06/23/2003 1:18:07 AM PDT by AUH2OY2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Equal outcomes regardless of effort: socialism in action. Destruction of a nation in consequence.
3 posted on 06/23/2003 1:19:32 AM PDT by Tin-Legions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
BUMP for later comment.
4 posted on 06/23/2003 1:27:40 AM PDT by mrustow (no tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AUH2OY2K
A cry in the black education wilderness
5 posted on 06/23/2003 1:47:23 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tin-Legions
Equal outcomes regardless of effort: socialism in action. Destruction of a nation in consequence.

Bump!

6 posted on 06/23/2003 1:48:01 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Bump!
7 posted on 06/23/2003 1:48:17 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
bttt
8 posted on 06/23/2003 2:00:52 AM PDT by Phyto Chems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AUH2OY2K
I wonder what the results would be if they took the black students' results and separated that by native black American childrens' results and the results of children of recent black immigrants from Africa. I bet the children of the recent immigrants are scoring much higher.
9 posted on 06/23/2003 4:51:06 AM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xrp
***Critics say the tests are unfair to minorities. And they cite education experts who say a student's fate should not rest on a single exam. Both points are valid. As are parents' complaints when suddenly told that their children won't graduate. Even so, those problems reflect how some states implement the exams -- not their worth. ***

__________________________________________________________________

It's a real shocker when you've been sporting a "My Kid is on the Honor Roll" bumper sticker!

_____________________________________________________________

***Minorities do fail the exams at higher rates, a gap that shows up on all standardized tests. Ideally, that fact should pressure states and schools to do more to help minority students, well in advance of graduation. ***

_____________________________________________________________

Yes, by having teachers qualifed to teach the subject matter, teaching English-only and dumping the "education's a white man's game" attitude.

10 posted on 06/23/2003 4:57:57 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AUH2OY2K
Critics say the tests are unfair to minorities.

I never have understood this. Where is the logic (any logic) to support this statement? It's not like minorities (what a broad brush) receive tests written in Greek while non-minorities (ie white) receive Dr. Seuss coloring books.
11 posted on 06/23/2003 5:05:21 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
No, it's because the racist tests pepper their questions with racist terms like "snow" and use White names like "Jack" and "Sue".
12 posted on 06/23/2003 5:13:52 AM PDT by Guillermo (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
In my hometown my graduating class was the first class that HAD to pass a test like this. They issued it the freshman year and, if you failed, you were placed in classes to help you catch up. You then took the test every year until your Senior year with special classes assigned as needed.

I knew one of the teachers who taught these classes and there were people in there who could not divide four by two.
13 posted on 06/23/2003 5:26:26 AM PDT by zx2dragon (I could never again be an angel... Innocence, once lost, can never be regained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zx2dragon
there were people in there who could not divide four by two.

I went to have some blinds cut the other day. I had to show the cutter how to read the markings on the table measure. This is criminal. We must demand students understand the material or they DON'T advance a grade!! Also dump tenure and get ignorant teachers away from students.

14 posted on 06/23/2003 5:33:08 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: zuggerlee
I agree with you on the curriculum. But where would the social stigma be when thousands of 3rd, 4th, etc. graders shouldn't advance? If staying put until you know the material was adhered too, the kids and their parents would get the message. How can dropping out (the pc phrase is early leavers) be worse than sitting in class for 12 years and not being able to read, write or add?
16 posted on 06/23/2003 6:04:55 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Even allowing students the ability to retake the exit exams as many as five to six times won't satisfy everyone. Look a Florida. School officials wanted to graduate those who failed multiple times, so that later while in college, they could again attempt to pass. Sounds more like school officials are more interested in C.Y.A than A.B.Cs.
17 posted on 06/23/2003 6:13:47 AM PDT by Mariposaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Unfair to minorities," eh? Which minorities? By the same amounts, or by varying amounts?

Thomas Sowell would have a fine old time with this. The refusal to disaggregate below the suggestive but unspecific "minorities" implies that there are critical differences hidden in the aggregate -- differences too embarrassing for these "critics" -- also unspecified, both in identities and affiliations -- to allow the public to learn about them.

"Figures cannot lie, but liars can figure." -- Mark Twain.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason:
http://palaceofreason.com

18 posted on 06/23/2003 6:14:21 AM PDT by fporretto (This tagline is programming you in ways that will not be apparent for years. Forget! Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mariposaman
Sounds more like school officials are more interested in C.Y.A than A.B.Cs.

Bump!

19 posted on 06/23/2003 6:27:27 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
And people who offer nothing but misery use the race and class-envy card.

"Figures cannot lie, but liars can figure." -- Mark Twain.

My mother often used this quote.

20 posted on 06/23/2003 6:29:47 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson