Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
Just for a reference point, that is 2/3 (0.68) of a kiloton. When people talk about small nukes, either as we might use them or as potential terrorist countries might use then, they need to realize that this massive amount of conventional explosives is only a fraction of the smallest of nukes.
24 posted on 06/22/2003 3:54:53 PM PDT by TN4Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TN4Liberty
Just for a reference point, that is 2/3 (0.68) of a kiloton. When people talk about small nukes, either as we might use them or as potential terrorist countries might use then, they need to realize that this massive amount of conventional explosives is only a fraction of the smallest of nukes.

Only if it's TNT. If it's a higher yield explosive the ratio above wouldn't work.
26 posted on 06/22/2003 4:02:14 PM PDT by gaucho (People used to come to the US for prosperity and now we just export it to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: TN4Liberty
Weren't the 9/11 impacts on the WTC about .5 kilotons each? That would make this about as severe. Not enough to level a city, but certainly enough to wreck a few blocks.
50 posted on 06/22/2003 4:33:30 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson