Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lubbock Republicans Will Insist on Three Congressmen for West Texas
Lubbock, TX, Avalanche-Journal ^ | 06-22-03 | Kitchen, Sebastian

Posted on 06/22/2003 5:51:23 AM PDT by Theodore R.

Local legislators aim to hold ground By SEBASTIAN KITCHEN AVALANCHE-JOURNAL

State Rep. Delwin Jones has participated in redistricting three times in three decades, and he soon will join local legislators in a fight to keep West Texas representation.

A special session called for June 30 by Gov. Rick Perry will address congressional redistricting.

Jones and Rep. Carl Isett, both Lubbock Republicans, waited in Austin last month as Democrats brought the House to a standstill by holing up for four days in an Ardmore, Okla., hotel to fight redistricting.

Redistricting was pushed by state and federal Republicans to increase the number of Republicans in Texas' congressional delegation.

Local legislators worry about diluting West Texas representation in the U.S. House and damaging support of rural and agricultural Texas.

"The primary goal of our West Texas delegation is to preserve all of the voting strength at the congressional level that we can for West Texas," Jones said.

State Sen. Robert Duncan said the impact of any bill on rural Texas needs to be examined because any rural issue affects the entire state.

"For our region, we have to make sure that we don't lose any representation in Congress, that would mean keeping the same number of seats out here that we have now," said Duncan, a Lubbock Republican.

"My primary concern is that we don't lose political influence in Washington for agriculture and West Texas and oil and gas interests," he said.

Duncan said those are all important economic drivers.

West Texas will maintain three congressmen under the plans Jones said he has seen, but there is a geographic shift.

One district, occupied by U.S. Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Clarendon, currently is centered near Amarillo.

The 19th District, recently claimed by Randy Neugebauer, includes Midland, Odessa and Lubbock.

Abilene anchors a third district to the east that in 2002 re-elected longtime U.S. Rep. Charles Stenholm, D-Abilene.

Jones, who has been chairman of previous redistricting efforts, said the shift would move Abilene into the 19th District — pitting Neugebauer against Stenholm, a Democrat who is a ranking member of the House Agriculture Committee.

Midland and Odessa would be moved into a different district, adding more of an oil and gas influence to the local congressional delegation.

"There will still be three votes," Jones said. "The only shift in it is with Midland/Odessa being in a district of its own. There will be more focus on oil and gas orientation than agricultural production."

Stenholm is in a primarily Republican district and is a target as Republicans look to shore up their numbers in Washington.

Jones said that because of Stenholm's position on the agriculture committee and his importance to agriculture, Jones does not want to see him redistricted out of office.

Duncan said he needs to study the possible effect of stretching the district past Abilene to the east.

"I have some concerns when a district runs as many miles east and west," he said. "You have to make sure you are not isolating people. That's a concern you have."

Duncan said he has not prejudged any plan and no redistricting bills ever made it to the Senate during the regular legislative session.

Lubbock will be well-represented during the redistricting process.

Duncan leads the Senate Committee on Jurisprudence, which will work on the issue, and Isett is on the House Redistricting Committee.

Isett said he and Duncan "will work closely together to make sure our influence is not diluted in the congressional delegation."

Isett and Jones both said they believe the redistricting effort will not be as fiercely divided by partisan politics.

Public hearings should help with bipartisanship and will help people who have an interest and want to voice their opinion in the redistricting process, Duncan and Isett agreed.

"The problem with redistricting is it is inherently partisan and inherently divisive," Duncan said. "That is the nature of the beast. The way I intend to handle that is, typically in the Senate, we make sure everyone has appropriate input and that they have an opportunity to be heard and they have adequate access to the plans."

The House will begin conducting hearings before the special session starts.

A Lubbock hearing is scheduled from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. Thursday at Texas Tech's International Cultural Center, 601 Indiana Ave. Other hearings are set for San Antonio, Brownsville, Houston, Dallas and Nacogdoches.

"We will have as many hearings as it takes to get input from around Texas as to what needs to be considered in drawing new lines," Isett said. "It is good to remember, it is our obligation to draw these lines.

"They were drawn by courts, and we need to fulfill our constitutional requirement," he said.

Duncan said the Senate also will conduct hearings.

"The main thing you have to do is listen to the concerns of everyone and then pass out a plan that has the consensus. That is what the process is all about," he said.

Duncan said the plan also must meet constitutional and statutory federal requirements.

"The No. 1 goal that you have is to make sure that the members of the committee are advised and have ample resources to evaluate plans both in legal and demographic requirements," he said.

"You have to make sure the process in which we review redistricting proposals is open and fair."

Jones said he does not believe districts should be redrawn to alter their political landscape and influence its political direction.

"People make the final decision," he said. "They support a Republican or Democratic individual. In a large number of areas that have elected a Democrat congressman, they vote Republican on the governorship and U.S. Senate. In local congressmen, they vote Democrat.

"They vote more for the individual," Jones said.

He said redistricting to alter the political landscape should not happen, but computers make it easy to determine heavily partisan areas.

skitchen@lubbockonline.com 766-8753


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; duncan; isett; jones; lubbock; redistricting; stenholm; tx; westtx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
The Lubbock all-Republican delegation is emerging as strong defenders of a neighboring DEMOCRAT congressman: Charles Stenholm of Abilene.
1 posted on 06/22/2003 5:51:24 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
West Texas? Isn't that El Paso?
2 posted on 06/22/2003 5:58:34 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
Actually, El Paso is considered "Southwest TX," a distinct area from West TX. West TX is principally the land bound by Wichita Falls, Abilene, Amarillo, Lubbock, and Odessa-Midland.
3 posted on 06/22/2003 6:03:28 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Isn't Ron Paul in west Texas? Bet they'd love to redistrict him out of their hair.
4 posted on 06/22/2003 6:20:55 AM PDT by steve50 (I don't know about being with "us", but I'm with the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
OK I get it. "West Texas" is East of El Paso! :)
5 posted on 06/22/2003 6:27:21 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Ron Paul is in a district to the SW of Houston. It includes the Democrat city of Victoria (which he won overwhelmingly and is the home city of Democrat lt. governor candidate John Sharp) and smaller coastal cities such as Bay City, Freeport, Lake Jackson, etc. The current districting actually enhanced Paul's chances of holding the seat for several more terms.
6 posted on 06/22/2003 6:27:23 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
No, "West Texas" begins about 150 to 200 miles NORTH of El Paso.
7 posted on 06/22/2003 6:28:10 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I should say that "West TX" begins some 200 miles north AND east of El Paso. TX really could be five states.
8 posted on 06/22/2003 6:29:11 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
The Lubbock all-Republican delegation is emerging as strong defenders of a neighboring DEMOCRAT congressman: Charles Stenholm of Abilene.

I don't blame them. If they lose a Congresssional seat now they probably won't ever get it back. On the other hand Stenholm has a pretty conservative voting record. The only thing he doesn't do is vote for the Repblicans to organize Congress. Whenever Stenholm decides to retire, his district will probably elect a Republican. Considering he only received 51% of the vote when he ran for reelection in 2002, that retirement might not be voluntary.

9 posted on 06/22/2003 6:29:23 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
No, "West Texas" begins about 150 to 200 miles NORTH of El Paso.

No, West, Texas is located just north of Waco on I-35 at exit 353.

10 posted on 06/22/2003 6:34:22 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
West TX (the region) is not West, TX (a town in, is it, McLennan Co.?).

I broke down in West, TX, once and had a very bad experience there. The town is mostly Czech in ethnicity.
11 posted on 06/22/2003 6:43:34 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Silly me, I thought New Mexico was North of El Paso...
12 posted on 06/22/2003 6:47:17 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I should say that "West TX" begins some 200 miles north AND east of El Paso. TX really could be five states.

So "West Texas" is really "North East" Texas? :)

13 posted on 06/22/2003 6:51:51 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
If they lose a Congressional seat now they probably won't ever get it back.

Read your Constitution. Redistricting occurs after every decadal census. It's meant to ensure that the House of Representatives remains that, representative. Current law is a little vague (to me) as to the maximum citizens in a US House district, but the minimum remains at about 160,000 citizens. Maximum number may be [current national population] divided by 435.

14 posted on 06/22/2003 6:55:24 AM PDT by woofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
West TX (the region) is not West, TX (a town in, is it, McLennan Co.?).

I broke down in West, TX, once and had a very bad experience there. The town is mostly Czech in ethnicity.

I know. I was just kidding. You're right about it being mostly Czech. There is an execellent Czech bakery/gas station/convenience store called the "Czech Stop" at exit 353 that sells kolaches. I usually stop there when I go to or from the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

15 posted on 06/22/2003 6:59:10 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: woofer
I think the minimum number is 1 per state. Each district has around the same number of people in it.
16 posted on 06/22/2003 6:59:55 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Lubbock . . . what a miserable hole. Dust storms and tarantulas. Blech. Give me my 95% humidity any day.

But it still beats Amarillo.
17 posted on 06/22/2003 7:00:48 AM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
"West TX" is to a degree the NW quadrant of Texas.
18 posted on 06/22/2003 7:05:54 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
However, most geographers also make a distinction between the Panhandle and West Texas. I was putting in the Panhandle as part of West Texas. So West TX would be more populous than Panhandle TX.
19 posted on 06/22/2003 7:10:25 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: woofer
Read your Constitution. Redistricting occurs after every decadal census. It's meant to ensure that the House of Representatives remains that, representative. Current law is a little vague (to me) as to the maximum citizens in a US House district, but the minimum remains at about 160,000 citizens. Maximum number may be [current national population] divided by 435.

It has nothing to do with the size of the districts. They will all be pretty close to each other in population. It has to do with taking apart the current districts and taking voters from currently strong Republican districts and adding them to districts that currently lean DemocRAT. While this may increase the number of districts Republicans control state wide, it could reduce the influence of West Texas by diluting their voting strength among several districts. The plan favored by Delay would eliminate Stenholm's seat.

20 posted on 06/22/2003 7:17:30 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson