To: Susannah
Umm, you're kind of making DPB's point. That 62% income tax rate is on labor.
If you sell stocks or receive, you're only at taxed (now) at 15%. Better yet, if you never sell the stock but rather just use it as a collateral on a loan, you're not taxed at all. If anything Edwards understates his case. The payroll tax is 7.65% on the employee side AND on the employer side, so it's really over 15% coming out of the employee's pocket.
I agree with DPB, it's embarassing that Johnny Edwards is making this point. But it's a sound one.
50 posted on
06/23/2003 8:02:25 AM PDT by
Maximum Leader
(run from a knife, close on a gun)
To: Maximum Leader
Sell stocks or receive DIVIDENDS-- sorry for mangling my second sentence. :o)
51 posted on
06/23/2003 8:04:00 AM PDT by
Maximum Leader
(run from a knife, close on a gun)
To: Maximum Leader
Umm, you're kind of making DPB's point. That 62% income tax rate is on labor. OK, after the insane 62% or higher taxes are paid, I have some money left over to pay for food, housing etc. I take what little is left over and invest it.
You're mad that if, if I make a profit on my investment, (which is hopefully creating jobs and value for the rest of the economy), I only have to pay a 15% capital gains tax? Or 15% on my dividends? The corporation already paid taxes on its earnings, remember?
Did I log onto DU by mistake this morning?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson