To: Buckeroo
There was no coalition, BTW. It was America 250,000 troops followed by Britain 30,000 troops and Australia 5,000 troops. If you call that a coalition, then you don't understand the term. Don't act like an idiot, because I know damn well you aren't. A coaltion is about much more than just troops. It's about shared intelligence, humanitarian aid, and, in some cases, simply standing with you publicly.
Are you discounting Spain? What about the former Soviet bloc countries? All out the window?
334 posted on
06/22/2003 3:11:57 PM PDT by
Cathryn Crawford
(I'm not prejudiced - I hate everybody equally.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
What does it matter? Are you saying that an 'atta-boy' by socialists is an important bench-mark for claiming a coalition?
To: Cathryn Crawford; All
Well, Bucky's been an interesting and entertaining diversion these past two days, but I've got more important things to do, like grill a couple of chicken breasts in a white wine sauce out back.
Have fun, Ms. Crawford.
338 posted on
06/22/2003 3:57:54 PM PDT by
Long Cut
(Any time now...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson