Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Cree
"Clearly, I don't have any in depth understanding of this kind of stuff, but to my layman's mind, or from my vantage point, if time is static, then we, or something, appear to be moving."

Minkowski taught us that time is a coordinate axis, just like "X", "Y" and "Z". Coordinate axes do not "flow".

If one were born on a train (on an infinitely long and smooth track) and spent all his life there, and the train never stopped or slowed, by looking out of the window he would conclude that "X" (the coordinate axis X) flowed.

When Rudy Rucker (the mathematician and writer) met Kurt Gödel (a contemporary of Einstein and probably more intelligent), one of the questions he asked Gödel was: "What causes the illusion of the passage of time?"

Gödel answered obliquely, not directly addressing the question...but he did not say, "What kind of stupid ass question is that?!" In other words, he tacitly accepted Rucker's premise that the passage of time is an illusion...

--Boris

210 posted on 07/03/2003 10:08:53 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: boris
Well, yeah, makes sense. I am understanding the analogy, if not the reality. The train itself is moving, not the axis.

One is as easy to accept as the other. Although I am not sure how these guys decided time was an axis.
211 posted on 07/03/2003 10:14:14 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson