Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rudy45
For what it's worth, the United States Army continues to discover that the 9mm round is inadequate in re 'stopping power' in combat. Multiple complaints coming out of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq are documented in official 'lessons learned' reports.

The reason the Army adopted the .45 in the first place was that the .38 caliber pistol was too weak when used against the Moro tribesmen in the Phillipines, and hence when the .45 was successful in shooting and stopping doped-up insurgents, it became the M1911 service pistol.

I own a Beretta 9mm, and hope to buy a Kahr 9mm for concealed carry, regardless of these facts. Why? Combat engagement ranges are usually in excess of 50 meters, and personal protection situations usually are less than 10 meters. I'm gaining concealment of a smaller weapon for the trade off in stopping power (particularly at distance). Plus I plan and train to shoot two rounds center mass of target, and then re-evaluate the threat.

So, it really comes down to what you're comfortable carrying, shooting and hitting your target with.

14 posted on 06/21/2003 6:20:26 AM PDT by ReaganCowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ReaganCowboy
Have you tried the Taurus PT145? It's a medium sized .45 that holds 10 rounds. In my hand the barrel only sticks out 1.5 inches past my pointy finger when I extend it.
16 posted on 06/21/2003 6:37:48 AM PDT by Bogey78O (check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson