Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DAnconia55
No it's commendable for webber to bring this to our attention. In the UK free network (not cable/satelite) TV has hardcore porn after 10. You don't want that to happen in your country. Be vigilant!

By the way, was Murdock behind "Queer as folk"? That was a sick series.
8 posted on 06/20/2003 6:17:04 PM PDT by ellhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ellhow
By the way, was Murdock behind "Queer as folk"? That was a sick series.

It's on Showtime, which is owned by Viacom -- the same people who own Simon and Schuster, which published "lying history."

30 posted on 06/20/2003 6:56:32 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ellhow
No it's commendable for webber to bring this to our attention. In the UK free network (not cable/satelite) TV has hardcore porn after 10. You don't want that to happen in your country

I don't?

51 posted on 06/20/2003 7:18:55 PM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ellhow
"Queer as folk"?

Never seen it, but I call it Queer Ass Folk.

'tis a better title, IMO.

52 posted on 06/20/2003 7:20:00 PM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ellhow
TV has hardcore porn after 10. You don't want that to happen in your country

I believe the best way to stop that is through the market.

77 posted on 06/20/2003 7:33:25 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say goodnite to da Bad Guy" - Tony Montana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ellhow
In the UK free network (not cable/satelite) TV has hardcore porn after 10. You don't want that to happen in your country.

Speak for yourself!

400 posted on 06/21/2003 1:44:18 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ellhow
By the way, was Murdock behind "Queer as folk"? That was a sick series.

The minute I heard of that show, I had a new name for it: "Queer As* Folk" (As* sounds a lot like As).

I have pretty much given up on TV. I usually don't watch more than two hours a week. I don't have cable or satellite, and when TV goes digital I will not replace my 20 year old analog TV -- that will be the end of it. There isn't much besides increasingly lurid sit-coms and these stupid "reality shows" anyways.

I have mixed feelings about getting the government more involved in regulating what is on TV. The root of the problem is cultural. America has been so dumbed-down and coarsened that horrible TV is inevitable. Anything intelligent that actually has values doesn't stand a chance. I'm still upset that FOX cancelled "Firefly," which was the most original thing in years and instead FOX and the other networks copied each other's "reality shows" ad nauseum. The fact is that when enough people accept mediocrity, mediocrity is exactly what they will get and nothing else! Rather than having interesting characters or plots, the writers can just take the mediocre way out and choose vulgarity for its shock value. Vulgarity is sure to bring in the ratings while producing something thoughtful and challenging is risky. But once you bring in the government, what is to stop them from demanding that every show have, say, 10% homosexual content?

483 posted on 06/22/2003 5:15:36 AM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (Lurking since 1997!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson