Replies

Looks like you are the one who needs a "reality check". I don't "hate the debate so much" as you try to assign my role, but find it stunningly incredible that people like yourself will sacrifice any semblance of reasonable debate in order to blindly stand for the promotion of decadence and societal self destruction in your moral relativist stance.

"Hate" debate? Please! You should try to learn HOW to debate - your discordianist over-emotional rant indicates that debate is NOT tolerated by you and all the other moral relativists who ACT as though you don't mind living in the filth of a nasty sewer. And make no mistake, "popular" media has become this and as such is INJECTED into our society by those who take the view "Who is to say what is wrong?" (or the ever popular "sin is just God's opinion and are not ALL opinions equal?"). There is a point beyond which damage is done whether you care to see it or not (or "debate" it or not)

Are you ready to support the existence of a sitcom about the homosexual gangraping of children? Why or why not?

Are you ready to stand up for the televising of torture? Why or why not?

Are you ready to stand up for televising snuff films? Why or why not?

You see, small minded one, there is a line. There will always be a line. Where that line is drawn is the only question remaining. I believe that it should be drawn at a point that PROTECTS the culture - at a point that does not have any chance of damaging our society - NO chance for that damage. It is beyond ridiculous to support anything that is contrary to this more than obvious truth. In the past this was known. It should be known (and practiced) again. And don't worry, the usual outlets of seediness, debauchery, and the demeaning of humanity will still be available to you and your kind if you choose to do for yourself - NOT as you will be choosing FOR ME or my family. These illicit and depraved items can simply return to the seedy, decayed sides of town...

"DEBATE THIS" Sure, just as soon as you get your first clue about what you are saying (much less any pretense of "debate").. I won't be holding my breath however...

That was the most pathetic rant I have seen gracing these pages in a long time - Not wanting biog government to step in and solve every problem makes me a Moral relativist? Maybe you need to turn off the TV and read more - it's rotting your brain.

I prefer to hit the sponsors, i.e those who fund the filth that fills the airwaves - by doing so, I make it harder for them to keep funding it. Apparently you, on the other hand, just want Big Government to do it for you so that you dont' actually have to DO anything.

But hey, whatever floats your boat, man...

There will always be a line. Where that line is drawn is the only question remaining.

"Where that line is drawn" is obviously an important question, but I don't think that it's "the only question remaining."

Don't you think that another important question concerns who is drawing the line? Isn't that what's being debated here?