Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Vilsack [D-IA] OKs $503 million fund, vetoes $310 million tax cut ; GOP says veto illegal
The Des Moines Register ^ | 06/20/2003 | JONATHAN ROOS and LYNN OKAMOTO

Posted on 06/20/2003 9:15:34 AM PDT by newgeezer

Edited on 05/07/2004 6:40:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Republican legislative leaders accused Gov. Tom Vilsack, a Democrat, of acting illegally Thursday in vetoing portions of an economic stimulus package, including a $310 million income tax cut, while approving the creation of a $503 million development fund.

"The Legislature has no choice, really, but to defend itself" by bringing a lawsuit, said House Speaker Christopher Rants of Sioux City.


(Excerpt) Read more at desmoinesregister.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS:
Since the bills passed, Vil(e)Sack went on his annual "walk across Iowa," allegedly to talk to citizens about the issues and decide whether to sign. Now we know it was to give his henchmen time to determine whether he could get away with the line-item veto on the policy bill.
1 posted on 06/20/2003 9:15:34 AM PDT by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
It sounds as if the GOP in Iowa is a bunch of sore losers.

The people of Iowa gave the governor that line-item veto power in '68, so this shouldn't have come as a surprise to anyone, right?

I'm not defending the Dims, but what would we be saying about this if the shoe were on the other foot?
2 posted on 06/20/2003 9:33:28 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
You are correct. Bob Ray used the item veto.
3 posted on 06/20/2003 9:42:37 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
It sounds as if the GOP in Iowa is a bunch of sore losers. The people of Iowa gave the governor that line-item veto power in '68

Sore losers? As the article says, "In general, the governor can use his item-veto on budget bills, but not on policy legislation." The Republicans are saying the Governor vetoed policy legislation. Seemed pretty clear to me.

4 posted on 06/20/2003 10:37:13 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
It's true the Gov has the power and has the right to use it. However the GOP legislature can inform him that they won't fund his internet tax (which will pay for this) unless he signs the tax cut. Then Vilsack woon't be able to spend the fund since there is no money unless he caves.
5 posted on 06/20/2003 11:01:20 AM PDT by ssantomaur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ssantomaur
Not a Vilsack fan.
The real problem with government in Iowa is there's too much of it for the population. 99 counties, 350 plus school districts, etc. Of course, the first think a conservative legislator does when he reaches Des Moines is pledge to protect the courthouse and its bureaucracy back home.
6 posted on 06/20/2003 12:04:48 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson