Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deconstructing Rowling
National Review ^ | 6/9/03 | Dave Kopel

Posted on 06/20/2003 8:43:14 AM PDT by Antiwar Republican

Deconstructing Rowling
By Dave Kopel

J.K. Rowling is an Inkling. That's the well-argued thesis of John Granger's fine book The Hidden Key to Harry Potter. Granger demonstrates the absurdity of the claim that Harry Potter is anti-Christian. And even if you've never worried about charges brought by misguided fundamentalists, The Hidden Key will substantially augment your understanding of what's really at stake in Harry's adventures.

The Inklings were originally a group of Oxford dons who wrote Christian fiction. The most famous of them are J. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis. Lord of the Rings and the Narnia series never mention Christianity overtly, and in Tolkien's books, religion itself is absent from the plot. Yet these mythopoeic books aim to "baptize the imagination" of the reader — to teach her the importance of fighting for the right, no matter how powerful the forces of evil may appear.

Rowling has confessed herself to be a great fan of C. S. Lewis, her use of "J. R." for her byline evokes "J. R. R." Tolkien, and she is a member of the Church of Scotland (that's Presbyterian, for American readers).

The most useful parts of The Hidden Key are the author's extensive discussion of symbolism. Harry lives in Gryffindor House, founded by Godric Gryffindor. "D'or" being French for "of gold," we could translate the name as "golden griffin." The griffin has a lion's body and an eagle's wings — a hybrid of the animals that are master of the sky and of the earth, the griffin was traditionally a symbol of Jesus, master of the spiritual and temporal worlds.

The unicorn, too, is a traditional Jesus symbol; pure and powerful, it could only be tamed by a virgin, as Jesus could only be incarnated by a virgin. In Sorcerer's Stone, drinking its blood brings life, and its killing is an especially hideous crime.

The phoenix (which saves Harry's life in Chamber of Secrets) rises to life from its own ashes, and is described by T. H. White as the "resurrection bird." This explains the title of the almost-released book five, The Order of the Phoenix — that is, the alliance of people who band together to fight for resurrection values. "Order" also evokes the fighting Christian religious orders of the Middle Ages, such as the Order of the Knights of Malta.

Harry's father James was nicknamed "prongs," for his ability to turn himself into a stag. In Prisoner of Azkeban, when Harry conjures a magical patronus to drive away the soul-stealing Dementors (Latin for mind-removers), the patronus appears as a stag, shining "as bright as a unicorn." The stag is also a medieval symbol of Jesus.

John Granger recaps the plots of the first four books, explaining each of them as a form of trial in which Harry's purity of heart is tested. In The Sorcerer's Stone, Harry is able to find the power of immortality (concealed in a magic mirror) only because he does not want to use it for selfish purposes.

The villain in Chamber of Secrets is Gilderoy Lockheart — the gilded, or false, king ("roi" in French) with a "locked heart." Lockhart, best-selling author of a string of false books, is, Granger suggests, modeled on Philip Pullman, the militant atheist and best-selling real-life author of the Dark Materials children's series — books that were written as a deliberate refutation of Narnia.

In the climax of Chamber of Secrets, Harry descends to a deep underworld, is confronted by two satanic minions (Voldemort and a giant serpent), is saved from certain death by his faith in Dumbledore (the bearded God the Father/Ancient of Days), rescues the virgin (Virginia Weasley), and ascends in triumph. It's Pilgrim's Progress for a new audience.

Prisoner of Azkebanrevolves around two characters (Sirius Black the magician and Buckbeak the hippogriff) who are falsely accused and condemned. Jungian and Freudian themes abound, as Harry begins by fleeing from his fears (running away from the Dursleys), confronts his hidden memories of his dead parents, forgives the man who betrayed his father, and triumphs by mastering his fear. "Expecto Patronus," invokes Harry — or in Latin, "Expect the little father." As Harry achieves identity with his father James, the luminous stag appears and drives away the soul-killing Dementors, rescuing Harry's godfather Sirius.

Granger reveals the meanings of the names of all the important characters. Draco (dragon/serpent in Latin) Malfoy (faith in evil, in French); Harry's parents James (the brother of Jesus) and Lily (the Easter flower), nasty journalist Rita Skeeter (read: a bloodsucking pest), and more.

And "Harry Potter"? Well, the name does evoke Harry Hotspur, the prince Hal of Shakespeare's histories. But if you say it with a French or Cockney accent, it also reminds us of "heir." For "Potter," Granger tells us to look to the Bible's "potter verses" (e.g., Isaiah 64:8), in which God is described as the potter who shapes man out of clay. Granger's summary of Rowling's theme is that we are all heirs of God.

The Potter books are a magical work aimed to liberate their readers from materialism and to elevate their spirits. Harry leaves the temporal world of London by entering Diagon Alley — that is, by moving diagonally, not in the lines of the ordinary material world. And Dudley's grotesque weight and surfeit of toys are an extreme case of a spiritual death from immersion in a purely material world: a world which Rowling shows can be put aside, if one can think and live diagonally.

Harry Potter fans are used to scouring the Internet for the morsels of hints Rowling has offered about the rest of the series. The last section of Hidden Key offers informed speculation about what will happen in the final books; of course, some of Granger's guesses might be wrong, but his exposition of the series' themes makes many of his ideas seem almost inevitable. For instance:

Harry will be revealed as the true heir of Godric Gryffindor and the climatic battle will be fought at Harry's birthplace, Godric Hollow. The heir of Gryffindor will confront the Heir of Slytherin (slithering, like a snake), Voldemort. Dumbledore has powers of invisibility; that is how he knew that the orphan Neville Longbottom (no-village, long at the lowest place) stood up to his friends in Sorcerer's Stone. Dumbledore will die, because Harry must defeat Voldemort himself. Snape's mixed feelings about Harry — he saves Harry's life, but is angrily jealous of Harry's fame — can be traced back to Snape's school days; then, Snape loved the green-eyed Lily (perhaps a Slytherin student, since house color is green) who rejected him for James. No matter — love and sacrifice will battle with death, at first appearing to be defeated, and then triumphing gloriously.

There's much more in Hidden Key: Rowling's extensive use of alchemical symbolism (alchemy being a process in which spiritual purification is correlated with metallurgical purification), Aristotelian and Platonic themes, and Arthurian legend. Like King Arthur, Harry was hidden as a baby, raised without knowledge of his true identify, watched over from afar by a great wizard, and proves that he is the true heir by pulling out a sword — in Harry's case, by pulling Godric Gryffindor's sword from Godric Gryffindor's sorting ("sword-in") hat.

Hidden Key can be read in an afternoon, and if you can interrupt your progress through the Order of the Phoenix for a little bit, Hidden Key will greatly add to your understanding of J. K. Rowling's magnificent work.

Dave Kopel is a contributing editor of NRO.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: christianfiction; rowling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-189 next last
To: AmericaUnited
That's like saying, "letters are good, and if someone arranges 4 certain letters together to represent a bad word, it's not really a bad word because letters themselves are good"
That's actually correct....the word itself, like a symbol, is nothing more than a carrier of predetermined content. "In the eye of the beholder", so to speak.

Combine a common word for a male chicken with another term for a lollipop, and you get....well, "Monica". Or....as Patrick Swayze says in Roadhouse, "two words designed to elict a prescribed response".

-Eric

101 posted on 06/20/2003 11:24:58 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
I feel SO bad for the poor Barnes and Noble employees who will have to stack whole CRATES
of the devil tome over the next few hours. Pray for their souls.

I have probably condemned to hell some poor FEDEX employee
as well.. but I'll have my book on time!!! ;-)

102 posted on 06/20/2003 11:25:20 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
I'd pray for you too, but I'm afraid you're a lost cause. Heathen.
103 posted on 06/20/2003 11:27:50 AM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
"You two simple ones would argue that a butterknife and a Delta force commando knife are both knives, i.e. exactly the same.

Upside-down broken crosses have very different meanings and symbolism than the "Christian" cross."

No doubt, but what does that have to do with the Harry Potter series? There are no upside-down, broken crosses there.

You see, if you had bothered to read what you're condemming, you'd know that, and wouldn't make such simple errors.

But you haven't, and so you go blithely along, condemming what you do not know. There's no Satanism in Harry Potter. It's just childish magic make-believe. None of what's there is real. There is no Voldemort. There are no unicorns or Phoenixes. It's a simple, magical story. That's it.

Honor, Loyalty, Friendship, and Love are the winners in the books. Small-mindedness, bigotry, and mendaciousness are the losers in the books.

But you go ahead. Go right on believing what is not true about the Harry Potter series. It's of no importance. A few million kids (and adults) will go right on with their enjoyable reading, and you can stew and fume all you like.
104 posted on 06/20/2003 11:31:14 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
None of what's there is real. There is no Voldemort. There are no unicorns or Phoenixes. It's a simple, magical story. That's it.

WHAT??? Is that why my cats don't levitate when I say wingardium leviosa?

105 posted on 06/20/2003 11:35:48 AM PDT by retrokitten (It's levi-OH-sa! Not levi-oh-SA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
So if I do research and read about this stuff...that means it's true?
106 posted on 06/20/2003 11:36:48 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
No, I don't, and frankly your condescending attitude is starting to irk me. I'd like to keep this civil.

Sure, thats why you opened up with so many mocking posts. Stop being a crybaby.

107 posted on 06/20/2003 11:36:48 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
The "harken cruz" or NAZI cross can be found in Middle Eastern and Indian cultures which predate Christ by several thousand years. I believe that they are displayed in Schliemann's opus on finding Troy!
108 posted on 06/20/2003 11:37:28 AM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I had some Chani once...heartburn for days.
109 posted on 06/20/2003 11:38:14 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Sure, thats why you opened up with so many mocking posts. Stop being a crybaby.

I take it you're not planning to respond to my actual arguments, then.

Always helpful to know your opponent's level.

For the record, I am not whining. I don't whine. I don't need to. Logic and reason get me where I need to be.

I mock the situation, but my posts to you have been cordial.
110 posted on 06/20/2003 11:39:41 AM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte; humblegunner
I'd pray for you too, but I'm afraid you're a lost cause. Heathen.

ROFLOL

She's got your number Gunner.

I'm picking up my copy tomorrow. It's going to be a fun weekend.

111 posted on 06/20/2003 11:40:56 AM PDT by RikaStrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
I take it you're not planning to respond to my actual arguments, then.

Not true but you have to realize, sometimes "actual importantant stuff" demands my immediate attention.

112 posted on 06/20/2003 11:41:54 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
I shall await your reply.
113 posted on 06/20/2003 11:42:47 AM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
For a view of Harry Potter from an ultramontaine Catholic perspective, read the following written by E. Michel Jones.

Education as Magic: Harry Potter and the Culture of Narcissism

114 posted on 06/20/2003 11:47:57 AM PDT by ZeitgeistSurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
I hope not! It's mildly carcinogenic...
115 posted on 06/20/2003 11:52:33 AM PDT by null and void (Who Cries For The Krill?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten
You're probably mispronouncing it - it's "winGAAHRdium leviOHHsa" - not "levioSA".
116 posted on 06/20/2003 12:06:06 PM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten
Is that why my cats don't levitate when I say wingardium leviosa?

Oh, do be careful there. Remember young Neville and his feather. I'd hate to hear that you'd incinerated your cats.

117 posted on 06/20/2003 12:08:38 PM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
I shall await your reply.

Don't hold your breath for a reasoned response...

118 posted on 06/20/2003 12:13:25 PM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten
WHAT??? Is that why my cats don't levitate when I say wingardium leviosa?
It's a proven fact that cats only levitate when they hear food hit a bowl.

-Eric

119 posted on 06/20/2003 12:19:53 PM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: wysiwyg
LOL! Yes, that would be tragic. They wouldn't be so cute without thier fur.

I think we are going to see great things from Neville Longbottom either in this book or in the future.
120 posted on 06/20/2003 12:22:15 PM PDT by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson