Skip to comments.
Huge Russian Amphib May Fly US Skies
Aero-News.net ^
| Fri, Jun 20 2003
| Editorial from LGI Inc. Press Release
Posted on 06/20/2003 7:18:27 AM PDT by illumini
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: illumini
bump
21
posted on
06/20/2003 9:01:02 AM PDT
by
VOA
To: wardaddy
BIG Chalks.
22
posted on
06/20/2003 11:08:21 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Travis McGee
LOL.
....like the little girl calling 9-11 after Andrew to tell them a "big puddy cat" was in her backyard....and it was a mature Black maned male lion from the zoo...lol
23
posted on
06/20/2003 12:34:11 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(I was born my Papa's son....when I hit the ground I was on the run.....)
To: Travis McGee
But today, runway space is not so easy to come by near large cities, Or it's under heavy restrictions by the government and the unions, driving the costs up and the privacy and freedom down.
I would love to see general aviation shift back to the way things were. As it is, I would almost rather drive anywhere than fly these days.
To: illumini
Looks like a direct descendent of EkranoplanKM, the "Caspian Sea Monster."
25
posted on
06/20/2003 2:03:04 PM PDT
by
eniapmot
To: msdrby
Navy, er Air Force, er Aviation ping
26
posted on
06/20/2003 2:49:22 PM PDT
by
Prof Engineer
( Texans don't even care where Europe is on the map.)
To: demlosers
They should send one to Arizona right about now as a "test." :(
27
posted on
06/20/2003 3:03:46 PM PDT
by
adam_az
To: illumini
The Russkies design good aircraft, but if they are also responsible for maintaining it, no way I'm getting on board.
28
posted on
06/20/2003 4:31:01 PM PDT
by
kezekiel
To: Barry Goldwater
Back when Carter was president they put some JATO bottles on backwards on the wings of a C-130 to give it short landing capabilities. I've seen that in action at the El Toro air show, but a Marine C-130 pilot told me that those things put too much stress on the airframe for regular use.
29
posted on
06/20/2003 4:33:24 PM PDT
by
kezekiel
To: adam_az
Years ago, these were offered for a test, but our b-cats snubbed them. P-ed off they were. The report I read seemed to hinge on these birds taking on too much water, an environmental damage thing. Nuts when forestfire fighting kills people in blow ups, the perfect situatuion for heavy dumps. These can literally water bomb a site.
To: af_vet_rr
My weird thought of the day. It is amazing how much logic those thoughts sometimes have.
31
posted on
06/20/2003 6:44:55 PM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
To: Snickersnee
Does anyone else remember the Martin P5M? I believe it was the first jet powered flying boat way back in the 50s. As I recall, one of the big problems with it was that of spray getting into the jet engines. Offhand I don't remember which engines were used but they were not turbofans. They were mounted on gull wings, which were a sort of Martin trademark going back to the PBM.
To: illumini
Boeing built one or two for the military to replace the C-130 but it never sold. This was about25 or 30 years ago.
33
posted on
06/21/2003 9:46:08 AM PDT
by
kennyboy509
(Never eat any thing larger than yor head.)
To: af_vet_rr
I would love to see general aviation shift back to the way things were. As it is, I would almost rather drive anywhere than fly these days
Amen!
34
posted on
06/21/2003 4:53:43 PM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
To: af_vet_rr
My weird thought of the day.Ain't weird at all, my friend; I am with you 150%, like the plane and the idea.
Long live the free market!
35
posted on
06/21/2003 5:07:04 PM PDT
by
danmar
("The two most common elements in the Universe is Hydrogen and Stupidity" Albert Einstein)
To: Jesse
surplus A-10 Warthogs as "Firehogs". Why do we have "surplus" A=10s? Seems like not all that many were built in the first place and we need every one of them.
Logistics support has been getting a tad difficult it's true. But that's what happens when you drive the original manufactuter out of business and then drive the replacement to merge with one of it's rivals.
36
posted on
06/21/2003 10:59:18 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: 19th LA Inf
Martin built a supersonic amphibian. Was that the P5?
37
posted on
06/22/2003 2:22:54 AM PDT
by
illumini
(AMERICA. Love her or leave her!)
To: kezekiel
The Russkie jet has a really great retro-fifties look to it. The paint job reminds me of the old United Airlines scheme.
38
posted on
06/22/2003 3:22:11 AM PDT
by
whipitgood
(It's a beautiful world we live in)
To: illumini
Did you hear the one about the scuba diver and the water bomber ..... ?
39
posted on
06/22/2003 3:44:06 AM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: illumini
Hey how come I had to put in a name and password to enter this thread?
That has never happen in the five years I have been at FR.
40
posted on
06/22/2003 3:48:50 AM PDT
by
oceanperch
(Warning: James Carville is showing up again.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson