Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
As a former biologist (retired) for the USFWS, I have to honestly say I cannot answer your question. You may be very correct that NMFS may have lead jurisdiction over this issue. I've never worked with brackish water aquatics, but the ecological effects of introducing an exotic aquatic organism could eventually affect terrestrial lifeforms. This fact could bring the USFWS to the ESA, section 7 consultation table. I'm just glad I'm not the biologist who has to face this one although it is an interesting proposal.

Muleteam1

23 posted on 06/20/2003 3:30:30 PM PDT by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Muleteam1
I figured that NMFS might have the lead agency status. So many ocean species spawn in estuaries that one would think it likely. Of course, that doesn't portend well either for a decent technical solution or the people of Maryland. NMFS' handling of the issues surrounding anadromous salmonids here on the West Coast has been nothing short of fraudulent and destructive.
24 posted on 06/20/2003 6:52:35 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson