[mhking]

Two words: Child endangerment.

'Nuff said.

[RgnadKzin]

Obviously, you failed to read subsection (D) above.

It specifically states that a violation of the child restraint law cannot be used as evidence in any civil or criminal proceeding other than for a violation of the child restraint law.

This also addresses the post made earlier about throwing other violations at her if they can't do child restraint. There is no evidence that she was endangering anyone else.

So it really does not matter whether you think it is child endangerment or not, it is what the law says.

Or do we have to govern our conduct based on public opinion?

[Tamzee]

Wow, incredible thread... thanks for the ping :-)

Indeed a classic, I lost count of how many times I fell into giggles!