To: mylife
She wasn't charged with breast feeding a baby while driving.
She was arrested for not having a driver's license, a first-degree misdemeanor; failing to use a child restraint device, a minor misdemeanor; and obstructing official business, a second-degree misdemeanor, according to the patrol. She was later charged with child endangerment.
Should we pass a law on stupidity?
Works for me.
385 posted on
06/20/2003 3:50:28 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Howlin
She wasn't charged with breast feeding a baby while driving. She was arrested for not having a driver's license, a first-degree misdemeanor; failing to use a child restraint device, a minor misdemeanor; and obstructing official business, a second-degree misdemeanor, according to the patrol. She was later charged with child endangerment. Should we pass a law on stupidity? Works for me. As I understand the situation she did not have a drivers liscence but held an affidavit which is considered LEGALLY justifiable, Failed to use a child restriant system ( she did, and removed the child according to LAW to attend to its needs)
I dont see how she obstructed justice, and the trumped up charge of child endangerment is the crux of this thread!
402 posted on
06/20/2003 4:03:48 PM PDT by
mylife
To: Howlin
Should we pass a law on stupidity?
There's one on the books. Under Law of Natural Selection
It's not uniformly enforced but tends to correct over time. Capital Crime. See Darwin awards.
428 posted on
06/20/2003 4:36:19 PM PDT by
Kozak
(" No mans life liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session." Mark Twain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson