[Outlaw76]

You know that fluoridation has anything to do with this – I’ll take off my tinfoil hat when you take off yours ok? This issue is real, it is now, and it is verifiable.

Vaccination can be a good thing, using the cells harvested out of dead children is not.

Intentionally using murdered children to make any product is wrong.
That very use can cause problems because the cells of the dead baby (being a foreign substance) cause an immune reaction within the living child. The cells used are close to the cells native in the child that receives the shot. What can and does happen is that the Childs (living, not murdered so it's cells could be harvested.) own immune system turns on them and destroys them. It’s kind of like killing two birds with one stone. I'm sure pro-death crowd is happy about that.

[John H K]

Vaccination can be a good thing, using the cells harvested out of dead children is not.

If you'd actually bother to read the original post (despite the harvard address it's a random BBS hosted there, and an old post) and the information in the post above yours, it's pretty clear the starter of this thread is very seriously misrepresenting the issue.

There's no aborted fetal tissue in vaccines.

Some vaccines are grown in cell lines originating with ONE aborted fetus 30-40 years ago. The cells today are not actual "aborted fetus" cells, and they don't end up in the vaccine anyway.

So would you kill your kid to avoid using such a vaccine?