[Paul C. Jesup]

Feminism drivel in the guise of conservatism. Notice that the article was written in a way in which the writer (who is female) puts the blame on the boys for these girls losing their virginity.

Now to give the writer credit, she did try to talk the girls out of having sex, but at the end of the day, after these girl lost their virginity (by free choose), she blamed the boys and not the girls themselves for losing their virginity.

[Norse]

What's wrong with sex? Sure, not good for younger teens, but if you're 18-25, whats the big deal? If you do it right, you have nothing to worry about. Might as well have fun while you're young.

[y2k_free_radical]

This author has a real point.Dating in AMERICA today leads to massive immorality.Reversing the clock back to the way male-female relationships were for the vast majority of time would not constitute a negative.How many of you are in touch with the TEEN SCENCE today.Parents have left the teens to their own devices.

[ohioWfan]

Feminism drivel in the guise of conservatism

There's not one touch of feminism in this article. It's about making moral choices, and the wisdom of not dating......for both boys and girls. The author just happens to be a female, who knows the stories of other females.

My Christian, conservative kids have made the same choice not to date (and to wait for courtship of one they might marry) based on moral purity, and using their time more wisely (in church, music, sports and academics).

[Chancellor Palpatine]

For a guy whose idea of a love life and women stems from reading comic books, why do you even bother offering up an opinion?

Or did they cover this while you were watching "The Transformers" one day?

[billbears]

Feminism drivel in the guise of conservatism

Actually this is about as far from feminist as I could imagine. Interesting article bump.