Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MaggieMay
Well why would it be Prosecutorial misconduct if the Prosecutors and their Investigators didn't KNOW it was happening? Sounds more like a technical glitch that can't be blamed on anyone, to me. It certainly seems there was no deliberate ANYTHING. btw Is Geragos looking to have everybody but himself thrown off the case? LOL He looks just plain stoopid desperate.
23 posted on 06/19/2003 11:23:41 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Canadian Outrage
I am getting this information from Modbee.com. "Pertinent, nonpertinent, and privileged information might be containted,"DA Brazelton wrote in a request form the court. Judges who issue secret warrants lay out guidelines agents must follow....when they intercept "privilieged" calls between subject and his attorney, they must "mininize"or turn OFF the recordings. "Failure to mininize can be a fatal defect",said Perini, who is preparing unrelated litigation on wiretaps techology. In other words,a judge can throw out parts or all of the evidence.
24 posted on 06/19/2003 11:38:15 AM PDT by MaggieMay (A blank tag is a terrible thing to waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson