End the life of the embryo and you may presume you've ended the later ages of that individual's lifetime (and that is EXACTLY what the serial killer supporters presume they have a right to do, kill the very young to avoid the young growing into their natural later ages) ... else why do the pro-baby-slaughter advocates want to 'get them as early as possible'?
Every time someone chooses abortion to end their inconvenience, or to set aside responsibility for their behaviors, or to avoid the consequences of earlier choice, that person affirms the truth that the earliest age of a human being's lifetime is connected inextricably to later ages unless purposed termination is done (purposeful killing is done) ... unless they kill the vulnerable early aged individual human being, that being will reach the later ages of its lifetime. THAT is the truth of abortion thinking! They know the truth but choose to believe a lie or a field of lies because the lie(s) serves their selfish ends. Sadly, their selfishness relies on killing of an already alive very young individual human being to serve their older liberty.
The promoters and champions of the abortion holocaust must seek to cancel the truth in order to enlist others to their putrified castle of lies. That's why they use terms like 'reproductive rights', at once foisting the lie that an already alive but very young individual human being is of less human value than an older human being, foisting the lie that killing alive young is soemhow reproductive and to be viewed as a valid choice!
It's all about 'choice' all right, the choice to believe and further lies for the convenience of killing to avoid consequences. The reason the abortion champions are seeking earlier and earlier ways to guarantee the kill is directly related to the truth they know down deep, that an individual human being begins their lifetime at conception and if someone doesn't purposely kill that individual early on, the natural later ages of the individual's lifetime will very likely come about.