You illustrate, ahem, my point with your word pictures of abortion. Most pro-choicers prefer not to see those pictures and will go great lengths to get away from those pictures. They see a dismembered person, I assume, and that bothers them.
For that same reason the Nazis shipped the Jews off to the "work camps" and "relocation centers" - out of view of the vast majority of Germany. For all the propaganda, most Germans couldn't really see the Jews as total "non-persons". Or even the "enemy" in its full sense.
(I have this association just now of "taking leave of one's senses" and "moral disintegration".One reason I changed from pro-abortion to pro-life many, many years ago was partly because of an honest facing up to the reality of what I was advocating.
I think of the pictures.
That, and the moral indefensibilty of the act, based on facts of science and logic and reason.
The senses and reason and culture come together into a "moral gestalt".
And so far, I don't have even a hint of perception of the fertilized egg as a person. A picture of a ruined egg wouldn't bother me.
Along with pictures, I think of actions as a kind of summing up. For example, a thought experiment with me sitting as juror doesn't end with me finding a fertility clinician guilty of murder for incinerating surplus fertilized eggs.
I can understand a reason for such a law, that we need the insurance against dehumanization of real persons. I don't buy it, but can understand it.
I haven't had the ethical perception shift yet, where I see a person in the egg, worthy of defense for its sake.