You replied (in your chosen prevaricators mode),"Of course not. We are not talking about "any act", we are talking about reproduction - forming a family." No you're not, you gross liar, you're talking about and defending the killing of already alive children! And you keep shoving that lie like you believe it too!
Won't you be proud of yourself in this life when you succeed in confusing or deceiving some impressionable young female into hiring someone to kill the alive child within her body based on your proposed lie that killing the alive pre-born is 'reproductive', a right when deciding in god-like fashion which alive individual humans will be granted the right to continue alive in your kingdom and which will be sent to the shredder as unworthy of our omnipotent granting of the right to continue alive? Yes, you are of the ilk who would collect scalps, proud of your 'omnipotent limiting of reproduction'.
Hey, and you've got one worshipper at least, in XBob! He would toss a few alive babies on your firey idol, to appease your 'reproductive rites' because he isn't able to discern the aliveness of the unborn so they're fair game and you could probably enlist his worship, especially if you told him the toss would give him a shot at a cure for his diabetes.
And one more item, your worship, why have a woman have to go through the dangers of abortion? Why not give her the reproductive right of refusal, to terminate the crib-bound, since those little beggars are more trouble to take care of? It is a woman's, a family's right of reproduction to toss the inconvenient into the fires of Moloch or over the odd cliff or into the den of a ferocious carnivore. ... Your patina of righteous family planning is tarnished, ghoul. Killing the alive unborn little ones is not 'reproduction' nor a reproductive right. It IS a rite of child slaughter that connects you with some of the ancients, however. Aren't you proud? ... If dismembering an alive unborn child is reproductive rights, putting a fork through the brain of a crib-bound is also, because the both children are alive human beings differing only by location. Oh! Never mind ... the law says you cannot neglect a crib-bound unto starvation, so I suppose you'll have to forego the hiring of a serial killer for those nuisance whimperers in the cribs. But you can take consolation ... the SCOTUS has granted you supreme being where the unborn are concerned, so you can slaughter those as you wish in your 'reproductive rites'. Oh my! Better take care there too! There are fetal homicide laws in many states now, so you better be very careful to have not one sound that could be construed as someone wanted the inconvenient parasite, because killing the wanted babies in the womb is homicide (unlawful killing of a human being), so don't mess up your rites by ever claiming someone in the inner circle actually wanted the little blighter to continue living! [/sarcasm]
Bravo! This is the heart of the matter. Abortion is an ACT of murder, not reproduction. Semper is a moral relativist who uses himself as his own moral authority on all matters, as are virtually ALL pro-aborts.