To: presidio9
Morford clearly doesn't understand what "censorship" actually is. A private enterprise has every decide what they will and won't carry.
Having said that however, hiding the covers of Elle and Cosmopolitan tells me that Wal-Mart may be getting just a little bit carried away.
54 posted on
06/18/2003 8:09:44 AM PDT by
jpl
To: jpl
>>hiding the covers of Elle and Cosmopolitan tells me that Wal-Mart may be getting just a little bit carried away.<<
I did a quick search on Elle covers on google. They included:
Video Erotica for Women Only
Men, Sex, and Jealousy
The Elle Sex Survey
Couples that go to bed with their sex therapist
Married With Lovers
Sex and body issue
Cosmo covers included:
That bedroom trick that will blow him away
Your hottest holiday sex confessions
Know what he's thinking during sex?
The last sex taboo
His butt
Sex-clusive
7 deadly sex positions
Lust lessons
I could go on forever, but you get the idea.
Getting carried away? Wal-mart doesn't cover this up because they are prudish. Like most big companies, they have no real morals, they just follow the money. They know their typical customer doesn't want to deal with this (or have their children confronted with it), so they cover it up.
To: jpl
Having said that however, hiding the covers of Elle and Cosmopolitan tells me that Wal-Mart may be getting just a little bit carried away. I don't know. Maybe you would like to explain to a seven-year-old girl what it means to "BE THE BEST SEX OF HIS LIFE: To Tease Him Mercilessly, To Seduce Him Slowly, And Then Rock His World In Ways He Has Only Dreamed About."
As for Shania, I wouldn't kick her out. But that's not the point.
97 posted on
06/18/2003 8:47:38 AM PDT by
gridlock
("Living History" is like the "Living Constitution"; reinterpreted as current conditions require...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson