Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James ossuary determined to have been "fake"
Israel Insider ^ | 6/18/2003 | Israel Insider

Posted on 06/18/2003 5:15:18 AM PDT by Israel Insider

The Israeli Antiquities Authority announced today that an ancient stone box with the inscription "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus," was a fake. The authority also determined that a stone tablet bearing the "Joash inscription," with fifteen lines of ancient Hebrew detailing improvements at the Temple, was a forgery. The inscriptions on both items were made "in the modern era." Click here for this breaking story


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: israel; jesus; middleeast; ossuary; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2003 5:15:18 AM PDT by Israel Insider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
Acording to "excerpts" like the "expert" in the article, this was thought to be hugh, maybe even series.
2 posted on 06/18/2003 5:19:28 AM PDT by camle (no fool like a damned fool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
It means nothing to my faith one way or another, but even if the Jesus part was added later does not mean it is fake. The church atop the tomb was erected several centuries later, and most scholars agree that it is in the right place.
3 posted on 06/18/2003 5:25:46 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
accorrding to the "excerpt", the Jesus reference was added aaround 100AD, which is a few generations after the crucifuxion. This would be consistent with the recognition that this is a valuable object and needs to be ideentified by other that verbal lore.

Kinda like autographing a record breaking home run baseball after the game.
4 posted on 06/18/2003 5:33:12 AM PDT by camle (no fool like a damned fool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
The inscriptions on both items were made "in the modern era," the Antiquities Authority announced.

In her reports for Israel Insider, Altman, an expert on scripts and an historian of writing systems, wrote that the limestone burial box was "genuine," but the second half of the inscription, with its reference to Jesus, "bears the hallmarks of a fraudulent later addition, probably around the 3rd or 4th centuries, and is questionable to say the least."

Since when is the "3rd or 4th century" considered the modern era?

5 posted on 06/18/2003 5:37:08 AM PDT by SubSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
Yes indeed.
6 posted on 06/18/2003 5:37:23 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
If the Ark of the Covenant was found today, Isreal would declear it a FAKE to prevent a Holy War from erupting in Isreal itself.
7 posted on 06/18/2003 5:40:41 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
They have a lot of reasons to declear in Holy Item found as a fake.
8 posted on 06/18/2003 5:41:29 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
They have a lot of reasons to declear ANY Holy Item found as a fake.
9 posted on 06/18/2003 5:41:42 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
As a reader of Biblical Archaeology Review and other resources, I am very careful with the pronouncement of Israeli experts. There is a strong undercurrent of antagonism and bias (on boths sides) regarding anything that would prove the clear existance of Jesus Christ.

The Joash inscription (originally thought to have come from the Temple Mount excavation dirt brushed aside by Muslims working there) supports references to Solomon's temple in 2 Kings - IMHO is still open to debate.

I wait for clearer news, although none of this affects the truth I know :)
10 posted on 06/18/2003 5:42:01 AM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubSailor
Since when is the "3rd or 4th century" considered the modern era?

Because it was ruled out that it couldn't have been done in the messasoic or Jurasic periods...

11 posted on 06/18/2003 5:42:33 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Viking Kitten Sniper patrol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Ithe Ark of the Covenant has been found, and you are right...A Holy War would erupt...check out this site.
HTTp://anchorstone.com
12 posted on 06/18/2003 5:44:01 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Viking Kitten Sniper patrol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zavien Doombringer
Of course anyone who knows about the history of the Ark of the Covenant knows that it would be best to leave that Holy Item alone and stay at least 10 miles away from it. The Ark of the Covenant is probably one of the most dangerious Holy Items in history.

The movie, Raiders of the Lost Ark didn't even scratch the surface of how dangerious this Holy Item is. Just walking up to within ten feet of it can kill you.

It is literally a Act of God waiting to happen in a wooden/gold inlayed box.

13 posted on 06/18/2003 5:54:33 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Zavien Doombringer
Who needs the Ark of the Covenant. We've made ourselves a new one, don'tcha know.

The Ark of Hope

I wouldn't be caught within half a mile of this thing, for fear of lightning strikes from a clear blue sky...

14 posted on 06/18/2003 6:17:00 AM PDT by gridlock ("Living History" is like the "Living Constitution"; reinterpreted as current conditions require...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Israel Insider
an ancient stone box with the inscription "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus," was a fake

Judaism long ago determined that Jesus himself was a fake messiah. The Jewish Sanhedrin found Jesus guilty and demanded that the Romans execute Jesus. As I read this report it appears that The Israeli Antiquities Authority has taken the position that the evidence is fake, not that Jesus, Joseph, or James are fake.

15 posted on 06/18/2003 6:21:21 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
I looked at the site. It's proof that the enviro-whackos are their own strange religion: making their own pagan version of the "Ark of the Conenant" and putting the Earth Charter inside
16 posted on 06/18/2003 6:26:23 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer looking for next gig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
This "Ark of Hope" is something I would not have believed we were stupid/arrogant enough to come up with. It sounds like a scenario ready-made for an end-times novel.
17 posted on 06/18/2003 6:31:13 AM PDT by Glock19C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SubSailor
Since when is the "3rd or 4th century" considered the modern era?

Even if the inscription was added in 3rd or 4th century, the act would be consistent with ensuring that the future would know the significance of who was buried there.

18 posted on 06/18/2003 6:34:57 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer looking for next gig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
Judaism long ago determined that Jesus himself was a fake messiah.

What actually happened was that Judaism split into those who believed in Jesus being the Messiah (the first Messianic Jews) and those who didn't. Modern Judaism comes from those who didn't believe in Jesus. You still get Jews deciding the become Messianic Christians in modern times -- my sister-in-law being one of them

19 posted on 06/18/2003 6:38:27 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer looking for next gig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Glock19C; SauronOfMordor
BTW, There is a Bill in Congress (H.R. 1950) to get the US back into UNESCO. Write your Congresscritter to let them know that you don't support this kind of thing.

One More Month to Block Rejoining UNESCO!

20 posted on 06/18/2003 7:14:14 AM PDT by gridlock ("Living History" is like the "Living Constitution"; reinterpreted as current conditions require...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson