Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GingisK
There has yet to be a feature wotrh the upgrade expense.

Perhaps you don't need reliable TCP/IP communications in your SW development, or else you would KNOW that Win2K's TCP/IP stack is light years ahead of NT's. There are many other features that you would NEED as a SW developer (depending on the platform your SW runs on at the customer sites). Perhaps there are other reasons you don't want to switch to Win2K?

I've done them all as well. Win2K is much more stable than NT.

71 posted on 06/18/2003 7:07:37 AM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch (Education starts in the home. Education stops in the public schools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: ImaGraftedBranch
Perhaps there are other reasons you don't want to switch to Win2K?

As I said before, I don't wish to spend the BIG BUCKS just because the "new one" has been released. NT works just fine for the work I do; and, my NT is operated "stand alone" with no network. I prefer to work that way ... I don't need no stinking network. I develop embedded equipment. If those require networking, it is done compactly without any code bloat.

100 posted on 06/20/2003 7:57:37 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson