Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stark Introduces National Flood Insurance Program Fairness Act
http://www.house.gov/stark ^ | April 14, 2003

Posted on 06/17/2003 8:18:12 PM PDT by in_search_of

STARK INTRODUCES NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FAIRNESS ACT Legislation would protect homeowners, improve coordination between FEMA and local communities

April 14, 2003

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Friday, Rep. Pete Stark introduced H.R. 1861, the National Flood Insurance Program Fairness Act. Stark’s bill would make needed improvements to the National Flood Insurance Program by requiring that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) give proper notice to local communities and homeowners when their property is included in a special flood hazard area, as well as provide reimbursement to those homeowners whose homes were wrongly classified.

“Many local residents have homes that were recently classified as being within a special flood hazard area,” Stark said. “These homeowners were given little advance notice of their legal obligation to purchase costly flood insurance, which can be over $1,000 a year. On top of this new financial burden, many homeowners who’ve rarely if ever experienced flooding have had to bring in private surveyors to prove that FEMA wrongly classified their homes. They’ve found that even if FEMA corrects their mistake, these homeowners are still stuck paying the surveyor costs.”

“My legislation would ensure that citizens are given proper notice when their property is included in a flood hazard zone,” Stark continued. “It helps facilitate better coordination between FEMA and community officials in this regard. My bill also reimburses homeowners who successfully have their homes removed from special flood hazard status.”

Stark’s bill would require FEMA to notify each homeowner and the Chief Executive Officer of the affected community whenever there are changes to a flood hazard area. In doing so, FEMA would be required to provide a copy of the revised map, information identifying all the homes that are impacted, and a statement explaining the process for appeal. FEMA would also be required to reimburse a resident or property owner for reasonable costs incurred in connection with their property being removed from the special flood hazard area.

“Passage of this legislation is vital to making sure FEMA provides homeowners with sufficient and timely notice if they are required to purchase flood insurance.” Stark said. “It will restore fairness to the process by lifting a financial burden homeowners should not have to bear when they’ve successfully proven that their homes do not require flood hazard classification.”

Introduction Statement

FREMONT 39300 Civic Center Dr. Suite 220 Fremont, CA 94538 510-494-1388 WASHINGTON, DC 239 Cannon Building Washington, DC 20515 202-225-5065

(Excerpt) Read more at house.gov ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fema; floodzones; parasite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
Congressman Pete Stark has been fighting to get this going for about 2 years. Even though he is based in California, it is vital to those of us across the United States to become united and help give this man the support he needs to get this passed. Contact your legislators and urge them to support H.R. 1861. Let the American dream remain a dream and not the nightmare it is becoming for so many of us. Tell me, how is it that a federal agency (which is not elected by the people) is allowed to generate funds for itself in this manner? They come along and re-classify us as a high risk area. (All the evidence available does not support this at all.) Once we are declared high risk, then we have to go to them to buy the insurance to satisfy our mortgage holder. Isn't that illegal? Isn't that extortion? It sounds like something out of the pages of the Untouchables. A protection racket. It is our Federal Government at work. Let's get behind Pete Stark and H.r. 1861, the National Flood Insurance Program Fairness Act. Let the laws protect us from a Federal Agency bent on destroying us just because they can. Please visit Pete Starks web-site, sign his guest book and let him know we support him. http://www.house.gov/stark
1 posted on 06/17/2003 8:18:13 PM PDT by in_search_of
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: in_search_of
Lookin for a handout are you? Stark is a specialist in facilitating that. Meanwhile, I have no interest in subsidizing your insurance rates.
2 posted on 06/17/2003 8:24:31 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Bingo!
3 posted on 06/17/2003 8:28:41 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: in_search_of
if stark is for it, i'm against it.
4 posted on 06/17/2003 8:35:55 PM PDT by Drango (To be on or off my NPR/PBS Ping list please Freep mail me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: in_search_of
Who wants to subsidize people who sue?
5 posted on 06/17/2003 8:42:35 PM PDT by Rodsomnia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: AAABEST
I thought flood hazard insurance was like an addendum to your homeowners policy? Are you saying that flood hazard insurance premiums are sent to FEMA?
7 posted on 06/17/2003 8:51:48 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Drango
if stark is for it, i'm against it.

How can you be against FEMA actually having real data supporting their claim that homeowners are now in a flood zone? They're in the process of going around the nation delcaring all kinds of property in a flood zone all of a sudden, which in turn forces property owners to pay hundreds more a month to FEMA THEMSELVES. Yes, they declare who pays, and they collect the money. All by themselves, with no accountability or redress whatsever. Nobody to even vote out of office.

I will have to cough up several hundred dollars a month more to FEMA, just because they said so. How would you like that?

8 posted on 06/17/2003 8:55:09 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Why would a private insurerer care about arbitary maps? If you place is high and dry, just shop around. You know this is all about sudsidies. The subsidies of insurance in flood zones is a disgrace. Next thing you know, they will subsidize earthquake insurance, and by the way, I have my rich Pubbie hand out for that, but my hand should be bitch slapped.
9 posted on 06/17/2003 8:55:32 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
thought flood hazard insurance was like an addendum to your homeowners policy? Are you saying that flood hazard insurance premiums are sent to FEMA?

YES. They wind up underwriting everything, and they get to decide who pays. It's the biggest damn screw-job rip-off I've ever seen in my damn life.

10 posted on 06/17/2003 8:56:46 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Torie
I hate the subsidies you dingaling, I'M PAYING THEM. Did you sniff oily rags when you were young? We've never flooded here ever.

FEMA is coming in and deciding I have to pay for tornados in the Mid-West and multi-million dollar houses that suffer erosion in the hamptons. My premiums will wind up in the hands of FEMA, just because they said so and intentionally used junk science so they can raise money for themselves, and it seems we can't do a damn thing about it.

You really don't know anything about this, but decided to run your head anyway....DIDN'T YOU???????

12 posted on 06/17/2003 9:03:21 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Cut off all the subsides AAA, and free yourself from the golden handcuffs.
13 posted on 06/17/2003 9:04:23 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; backhoe; Black Agnes; countrydummy; newriverSister; brityank; forester; marsh2; ...
Ya'll should read through this thread.
14 posted on 06/17/2003 9:04:47 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Torie
If you are supporting the National Flood Insurance Program, you know not of what you speak. I don't know Rep. Stark from a hole in the Earth, but if he's wrong on every other issue, he's dead right on this one.

NFIP is a swindle, boondoggle, Big Brother government gone f***ing haywire program if ever there was one. No one who hasn't been through the ringer of being wrongly classified as being in a flood plain would have any idea of what I'm talking about. If you've been through it, you know it well.

And when I say "flood plain", don't delude yourself into thinking of the Mighty Mississip' or a beach house on the ocean. When these a**holes hit me with it, I was in a TOWNHOUSE with a teeny little creek about 1/2 mile away.

The property was over 10 years old, but FEMA was updating the maps. Some bureaucrat moved one of the lines on the map, and it cost me thousands of dollars and two years of hell to get the mistake corrected.

15 posted on 06/17/2003 9:05:39 PM PDT by Chief Inspector Clouseau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Why would a private insurerer care about arbitary maps?

What private flood insurance exists that isn't subject to the federal government's ruleswhims?

16 posted on 06/17/2003 9:06:26 PM PDT by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Cut off all the subsides AAA, and free yourself from the golden handcuffs.

BINGO!!!! I knew you had a brain!

What do I do in the mean time. My friends and family are getting screwed right in the rear-end, in a big way.

17 posted on 06/17/2003 9:07:10 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chief Inspector Clouseau
If it is all nutso, I assume private insurance companies will ignore it. If not, you and I have a business opportunity before us to grab.
18 posted on 06/17/2003 9:07:14 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Because you are not getting your share of the teit? I feel you pain, not.
19 posted on 06/17/2003 9:08:04 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Chief Inspector Clouseau
Sing it brother!!

This is an outrageous tyranical screwed abortion of a program. I can't say in words what this is. It's un-American.

20 posted on 06/17/2003 9:09:26 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson