Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Welfare wrestling match Supes argue over stalled Care Not Cash
The San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 6/17/03 | John Wildermuth

Posted on 06/17/2003 9:58:54 AM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:42:47 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

San Francisco supervisors spent five hours wrangling over the city's stalled Care Not Cash welfare reform plan Monday and finished with little more than finger-pointing, frayed tempers and the prospect of more of the same next week.

While Proposition N, which was approved by the voters last November, was scheduled to take effect July 1, court rulings have left it up to the supervisors to decide whether cash payments for many of the city's homeless should be slashed from as much as $395 a month to $59 and replaced with guarantees of food, shelter and other city services.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: carenotcash; sanfrancisco; welfare

1 posted on 06/17/2003 9:58:55 AM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
...cash payments for many of the city's homeless should be slashed from as much as $395 a month to $59 and replaced with guarantees of food, shelter and other city services.

The liquor store owners must be fighting this one tooth and nail.

2 posted on 06/17/2003 10:05:31 AM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
Costs of providing the new housing, meals and social services called for by Prop. N and promised by the city's Department of Human Services could far exceed the $13.9 million now spent on general assistance, Rose warned. It also could take longer than the city expects.

Find some vacant land and set up tents for the 2800. Feed them Army chow-line style. What they're spending now equals $4964.29 annually per bum.

Given free use of city land, it sounds very possible, at $2500 annually per bum.

3 posted on 06/17/2003 10:35:46 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
Not sure any of this matters. They'd just sell whatever was handed to them. Like a guy on the bus yesterday bragging about how much he received for his free monthly bus pass.
4 posted on 06/17/2003 10:41:29 AM PDT by LNewman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson