[MHGinTN]

Since first learning the truth of how Roe came to be decided, it has always shocked me that the court could make such a fiat ruling based on lies and false data and false witness to the court, yet when the truth is revealed to the nation the court refuses to take upon themselves to set the ruling aside as speciously argued!

[McGavin999]

I could be wrong on this Mike, but I don't believe the court can initiate any case. That would have to be done by the AG or one of the injured parties. It's good to see that Roe is taking it upon herself to get this going.

The dems have been using R v W to bash republican nominees over the head for the past decade and have really been using it lately. It would be truely funny if the court heard this on a fast-track basis and ruled immediately. It would completely take the wind out of the sails of the philibuster.

[scripter]

I'm not usually involved with abortion threads and just found this: Silent Scream. Back in the late 70s or early 80s I was pro-choice. Then I saw some films on abortion, one of which, I believe, was The Silent Scream. After that I started reading and realized the pro-life position was the only position I could hold.

[Mo1]

Since first learning the truth of how Roe came to be decided, it has always shocked me that the court could make such a fiat ruling based on lies and false data and false witness to the court, yet when the truth is revealed to the nation the court refuses to take upon themselves to set the ruling aside as speciously argued!

EXACTLY .. that whole case was one huge lie .. but yet it's made the law of the land

What ever happen to Truth and Justice?

[wita]

I have been preaching the doctrine of supreme court reversal for years. Any court decision founded upon lies, flies in the face of justice, and no one on the supreme court can stand and say they do not know in this particular case, that the 1973 decision has any basis in truth. The court is the problem and the solution, and they better get on with it.