However, this is a MISTAKE. Hopefully he will correct it. The point is that when he makes a mistake like this, especially one which several people on this thread immediately noticed, it causes him to lose credibility.
Why should I trust his statistics on the budget, for example, when I see an error such as this?
Once in a long while, I will listen to see if he can make me laugh. The parodies are too few anymore.
For reality, I have other sources.
I think Rush is being clever in this. Maybe too clever. He is trying to plant the idea that this oft-quoted "man in the street" is a Clintoon plant, in order to discredit papers who do these silly "man-in-the-street" features in the first place.
Face it, how many times do you hear these morons quoted spouting the most ridiculous line of Clintonista BS, and scratch your head and wonder if the whole World has lost it's collective mind. Planting the seed of an idea that these interviews are a Clintoon put-up-job would go a long way to minimize the effectiveness of these stories.